IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/indrel/qt7156631b.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Apples to Oranges: How Category Overlap Facilitates Commensuration in an Online Market Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Leung, Ming D.

Abstract

This paper theorizes on how categorical distinctions affect market closure. Contrary to expectations that greater variation in choices allows a buyer to optimize their transactions, I find evidence in a labor market for freelancing services which suggests otherwise. In particular, the less categorical overlap of past experiences of freelancers bidding on a job, the less likely a buyer will choose any of them and the longer it takes the buyer to do so if they eventually do make a decision. Because categories serve to demarcate like-experiences, greater categorical overlap of the past experiences of freelancers makes them easier to compare, thereby facilitating a decision. However, more experienced buyers of services should be more attuned to what skills are valuable for their task. Therefore, I predict that this effect is moderated by increased experience. These hypotheses are tested with data from www.elance.com. Support is found for the two main effects and partial support is demonstrated for the moderation effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Leung, Ming D., 2012. "Apples to Oranges: How Category Overlap Facilitates Commensuration in an Online Market Environment," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt7156631b, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt7156631b
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/7156631b.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business; Social and Behavioral Sciences;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:indrel:qt7156631b. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/irucbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.