IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/ctcres/qt8nc8422j.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Taxpayer Subsidies for US Films with Tobacco Imagery

Author

Listed:
  • Polansky, Jonathan
  • Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D.

Abstract

Forty‐one US states and several countries compete for big‐budget Hollywood film projects by offering valuable public subsidies. In 2008, states offered an estimated total of $1.3 billion to motion picture producers. On average, individual states now cover 24 percent of production costs for commercial feature films. Because an estimated 1.1 million current adolescent smokers in the US were recruited to smoke by tobacco imagery in films about 350,000 of whom will ultimately die from tobacco‐induced diseases, this report estimates the size of recent public subsidies for youth‐rated (G/PG/PG‐13) films with tobacco imagery. It explores making tobacco imagery a determinant factor in eligibility for public film subsidies so that these awards no longer work in contradiction to public health. A survey of the 147 films released to US theaters in 2008, each among the top ten box office earners in at least one week, finds two‐thirds of US‐developed, youth-rated film projects with tobacco imagery were filmed in the US, a rate typical of all films released by US studios over the past decade. Filmed in a dozen states now offering subsidies, these 35 movies contributed 71 percent of the 11.4 billion tobacco impressions delivered to US theater audiences by youth‐rated films in 2008. Based on this film sample and on film industry production cost data, states awarded an estimated $830 million in public subsidies to films with tobacco, including $500 million to youth‐rated films with tobacco. For comparison, the states budgeted $719 million for all tobacco control in 2009. More than half of states subsidizing films (22/41), including New York and California, spend or earmark more money for commercial film subsidies than for anti‐tobacco programs. An estimated 62 percent ($830 million/$1.3 billion) of state film subsidies go to smoking films.

Suggested Citation

  • Polansky, Jonathan & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2009. "Taxpayer Subsidies for US Films with Tobacco Imagery," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt8nc8422j, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt8nc8422j
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/8nc8422j.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Polansky, Jonathan R. & Glantz, Stanton A., 2012. "California film subsidies and on-screen smoking: Resolving the policy conflict," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt0t9099dr, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:ctcres:qt8nc8422j. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/ctcre/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.