IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/cshedu/qt2f53363n.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Recognizing and then Using Disciplinary Patterns of the Undergraduate Experience: Getting Past Institutional Standards

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Chatman

Abstract

The assertion that there are a limited set of generalizable good educational practices (Chickering & Gamson, 1987) with a common model of preferred active student engagement in learning (Kuh, 2001) is appealing to those responsible for simply stated institutional outcomes and to the faculty who teach in fields that espouse the same practices and outcomes (Braxton, 1998). After all, if they are wrong and educational experience and good educational practices differ in important, substantive, and replicable ways by area of academic major, then assessment, accountability, administration, and admissions become more complicated and less amenable to central “oversight” and uniform standards. This paper reports that there are indeed important differences in student experience and engagement by academic discipline, that disciplinary patterns of student experience cluster, and that academic performance by students in these clusters is differentially predicted by standard admissions measures and student engagement factors. Recognizing the differences and identifying the predictors will lead to better admission practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Chatman, 2009. "Recognizing and then Using Disciplinary Patterns of the Undergraduate Experience: Getting Past Institutional Standards," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt2f53363n, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:cshedu:qt2f53363n
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2f53363n.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brint, Steven & Allison M. Cantwell & Robert A. Hannerman, 2008. "Two Cultures: Undergraduate Academic Engagement," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt53g8521z, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nerland, Monika, 2012. "Changes In Knowledge Cultures And Research On Student Learning," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt72w5f09m, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    2. Carneiro, Ana Maria & Fior, Camila, 2023. "Student Engagement in a Brazilian Research Univesity," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt6b4667b3, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    3. Gregg Thomson, 2011. "DIVERSITY MATTERS: New Directions for Institutional Research on Undergraduate Racial/Ethnic and Economic Diversity," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt0k62w21b, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    4. Douglass, John A, 2012. "TALES OF UNIVERSITY DEVOLUTION: Organizational Behavior in the Age of Markets," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt28k3s3cj, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    5. Steven Brint and Allison M. Cantwell, 2011. "ACADEMIC DISCIPLINES AND THE UNDERGRADUATE EXPERIENCE: Rethinking Bok’s “Underachieving Colleges” Thesis," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt83q89897, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.
    6. Gregg Thomson and John Aubrey Douglass, 2009. "Decoding Learning Gains: Measuring Outcomes and the Pivotal Role of the Major and Student Backgrounds," University of California at Berkeley, Center for Studies in Higher Education qt2173006c, Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Education;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:cshedu:qt2f53363n. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://escholarship.org/uc/cshe/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.