Boundaries of Predictability: Noisy Predictive Regressions
AbstractEven if returns are truly forecasted by variables such as the dividend yield, the noise in such a predictive regression may overwhelm the signal of the conditioning variable and render estimation, inference and forecasting unreliable. Unfortunately, traditional asymptotic approximations are not suitable to investigate the small sample properties of forecasting regressions with excessive noise. To systematically analyze predictive regressions, it is useful to quantify a forecasting variableâ€™s signal relative to the noisiness of returns in a given sample. We define an index of signal strength, or information accumulation, by renormalizing the signal-noise ratio. The novelty of our parameterization is that this index explicitly influences rates of convergence and can lead to inconsistent estimation and testing, unreliable R2s, and no out-of-sample forecasting power. Indeed, we prove that if the signal-noise ratio is close to zero, as is the case for many of the explanatory variables previously suggested in the finance literature, model based forecasts will do no better than the corresponding simple unconditional mean return. Our analytic framework is general enough to capture most of the previous findings surrounding predictive regressions using dividend yields and other persistent forecasting variables.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA in its series University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management with number qt33p7672z.
Date of creation: 01 Dec 2000
Date of revision:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Goetzmann, William Nelson & Jorion, Philippe, 1993.
" Testing the Predictive Power of Dividend Yields,"
Journal of Finance,
American Finance Association, vol. 48(2), pages 663-79, June.
- Cochrane, John H, 1988. "How Big Is the Random Walk in GNP?," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(5), pages 893-920, October.
- John Y. Campbell, 1990.
"A Variance Decomposition for Stock Returns,"
NBER Working Papers
3246, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Bossaerts, Peter & Hillion, Pierre, 1999. "Implementing Statistical Criteria to Select Return Forecasting Models: What Do We Learn?," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 12(2), pages 405-28.
- Cavanagh, Christopher L. & Elliott, Graham & Stock, James H., 1995. "Inference in Models with Nearly Integrated Regressors," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(05), pages 1131-1147, October.
- Andrews, Donald W K, 1993. "Exactly Median-Unbiased Estimation of First Order Autoregressive/Unit Root Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 139-65, January.
- Ravi Bansal & Varoujan Khatchatrian & Amir Yaron, 2004.
"Interpretable Asset Markets?,"
2004 Meeting Papers
136b, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Phillips, Peter C.B. & Lee, Ji Hyung, 2013. "Predictive regression under various degrees of persistence and robust long-horizon regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 250-264.
- Amit Goval & Ivo Welch, 2004.
"A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction,"
NBER Working Papers
10483, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Ivo Welch & Amit Goyal, 2008. "A Comprehensive Look at The Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 1455-1508, July.
- Amit Goyal & Ivo Welch, 2004. "A Comprehensive Look at the Empirical Performance of Equity Premium Prediction," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2412, Yale School of Management, revised 01 Jan 2006.
- Clark, Todd E. & McCracken, Michael W., 2012.
"In-sample tests of predictive ability: A new approach,"
Journal of Econometrics,
Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 1-14.
- Todd E. Clark & Michael W. McCracken, 2009. "In-sample tests of predictive ability: a new approach," Working Papers 2009-051, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
- Todd E. Clark & Michael W. McCracken, 2009. "In-sample tests of predictive ability: a new approach," Research Working Paper RWP 09-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
- Shang, Hua, 2013. "Inference in asset pricing models with a low-variance factor," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 1046-1060.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lisa Schiff).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.