IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/anderf/qt2gp3p3fj.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The LIFO/FIFO Choice as a Signal of Future Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Bar-Yosef, Sasson
  • Hughes, Patricia J.
  • Venezia, Itzhak

Abstract

We explain the puzzling empirical evidence on the investory accounting choice through a management signaling argument. We assert that firms with lower nominal production costs than other firms have relatively less to gain from the tax advantages assocaited with LIFO adoption. For these firms, future nominal production costs are lower due to increased efficiency or technological improvements. Because of asymmetric information about future costs, and the moral hazard problem of direct communication, the managers of the more efficient firms are able to credibly communicate their production superiority by using the FIFO accounting method. We show in this paper that, if firms can choose the fraction of their inventory which is allocated to FIFO and LIFO, then a separating equillibrium exists in which firms with lower production costs signal their greater efficiency by allocating a higher fraction of their invetory to FIFO.

Suggested Citation

  • Bar-Yosef, Sasson & Hughes, Patricia J. & Venezia, Itzhak, 1991. "The LIFO/FIFO Choice as a Signal of Future Costs," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt2gp3p3fj, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdl:anderf:qt2gp3p3fj
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2gp3p3fj.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:anderf:qt2gp3p3fj. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aguclus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.