Duke Bristow (Anderson School of Management and Harold Price Center for Entrepreneurial Studies)
Abstract
The agency literature in corporate finance rests for the most part on the assumption that highly diffuse ownership is commonplace and managerial ownership small; the result is costly for shareholders. Evidence provided here is to the contrary. Even where ownership is dispersed, managerial ownership is often significant and the mean and ownership statistics are surprisingly large. Furthermore, there is not strong consistent relation, linear or non-linear, between ownership and valuation or profit. These relations vary greatly over time. These findings support Demsetz and Lehn (1985) and contradict the agency arguments in Jensen and Meckling (1976), Morck, Shleifer, and Vishny (1988) and McConnell and Servaes (1990).
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1997.
" A Survey of Corporate Governance,"
Journal of Finance,
American Finance Association, vol. 52(2), pages 737-83, June.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: