Viet Nam’s Lesson for China: An Examination of the Sachs-Woo Hypothesis
AbstractThis paper examines Sachs and Woo’s (1997, 2000) hypothesis on the basis of Viet Nam’s experience with her 1989 reforms that China would have grown faster had she followed the Big Bang approach to reform instead of the Gradual approach. The paper scrutinizes this hypothesis from the viewpoint of accuracy of facts, appropriateness of the characterization, and acceptability of the hypothesis. The paper finds that Sachs and Woo fall short of meeting these criteria. The paper then examines the possible reasons for Sachs and Woo pitfalls and shows that the source of these pitfalls lies in their subjective preference for the Big Bang approach to reform.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Laboratory for Macroeconomic Analysis in its series Working Papers with number WP13_2007_06.
Length: 48 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2007
Date of revision:
Economic Reforms; Transition; Viet Nam; China;
Other versions of this item:
- Nazrul Islam, 2008. "Vietnam's Lesson for China: An Examination of the Sachs–Woo Hypothesis," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 50(1), pages 111-157, March.
- O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vadim Khramov).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.