This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Political decentralization and policy experimentation

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Hongbin Cai (Guanghua School of Management, Peking University)
Daniel Treisman () (Department of Political Science, University of California, Los Angeles)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

What determines the enforcement of deregulation reform of business activities? What are the outcomes of deregulation? We adress these questions using an episode of a drastic reform in Russia between 2001 and 2004 which liberalized registration, licensing, and inspections. Based on the analysis of micro-level panel data on regulatory burden, we find that: 1) The reform reduced administrative costs of firm, on average; but, the progress of reform had substantial geographical variation. 2) The enforcement of deregulation reform was better in regions with a transparent government, low corruption, strong fiscal incentives (i.e., reliance of local budgets on local taxes rather than fiscal transfers) and a powerful industrial lobby. 3) Using the exogenous variation in regulation generated by the interaction of reform and its institutional determinants, we find a substantial pozitive effect of deregulation on entry and small business employment and no effect on pollution and morbidity. The results support the “tollbooth” theory of the nature of regulation and are inconsistent with either the public interest theory or the regulatory capture theory.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.cas.hse.ru/Repec/pdf/WP13_2007_05.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Vadim Khramov)
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Laboratory for Macroeconomic Analysis in its series Working Papers with number WP13_2007_05.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 40 pages
Date of creation: Jan 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:cas:wpaper:wp13_2007_05

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Pokrovsky blvd, 11, Moscow
Web page: http://www.macro.hse.ru
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Vadim Khramov).

Related research
Keywords: decentralization; innovation; policy experiments; voting; information.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Models of Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy-Making and Implementation

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc encourages publishers to make their bibliographic data freely available to the public.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.