This paper provides and employs a simple method for evaluating the quantitative importance of distorting savings in Mirrleesian private-information settings. Our exercise takes any baseline allocation for consumption—from US data or a calibrated equilibrium model using current policy—and solves for the best reform that ensures preserving incentive compatibility. The Inverse Euler equation holds at the new optimized allocation. Our method provides a simple way to compute the welfare gains and optimized allocation—indeed, yielding closed form solutions in some cases. When we apply it, we find that welfare gains may be quite significant in partial equilibrium, but that general equilibrium considerations mitigate the gains significantly. In particular, starting with the equilibrium allocation from Aiyagari’s incomplete market model yields small welfare gains.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Laboratory for Macroeconomic Analysis in its series Working Papers with number
CAS_RN_2007_3.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Vadim Khramov).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)