Accountability of UK Debt Management: A Proposal' In this paper, we argue that UK debt management policy is insufficiently transparent and accountable. The debt management objectives are poorly understood and accountable, and partly as a consequence, there is no formal mechanism for performance measurement by the public. We propose a number of institutional reforms designed to improve transparency and accountability. These include the definition of more explicit objectives, an independent Debt Management Office and ex post evaluation of the government's domestic portfolio relative to a benchmark. To illustrate how ex post evaluation would work in practice we examine the efficiency of UK debt management policy over ten fiscal years, from April 1985 to March 1995. In a number of years the actual UK government domestic debt portfolio underperformed the benchmark in terms of standard measures of cost and risk.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Howard Cobb).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: