The Major Field Test in Business: A Pretend Solution to the Real Problem of Assurance of Learning Assessment
AbstractColleges and universities are being asked by numerous sources to provide Assurance of Learning assessments of their students and programs. Colleges of Business have responded by using a plethora of assessment tools, including the Major Field Test in Business. In this article, we show that the use of the Major Field Test in Business for Assurance of Learning purposes is ill-advised. First, it provides no direct evidence of student learning. Second, it offers no useful comparative analyses to other business students or institutions. Consequently, it provides no guidance for curriculum or program changes to achieve better learning outcomes. Thus, use of the Major Field Test in Business offers only a ‘pretend’ solution to the problem of Assurance of Learning assessment.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Ball State University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 201201.
Length: 16 pages
Date of creation: Jul 2012
Date of revision: Jul 2012
Major Field Test in Business; assurance of learning; business school accreditation standards; pretend solutions;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-08-23 (All new papers)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Tung Liu).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.