The Evolutionary Foundations of Backward and Forward Induction
AbstractWe examine the evolutionary foundations of common equilibrium refinement ideas for extensive form games, such as backward and forward induction, by examining the limiting outcome of an evolutionary process driven by stochastic learning and (rare) mutations. We show that the limiting outcome in a class of extensive form games with perfect information always includes the subgame perfect equilibrium outcome, but also contains other outcomes if the subgame perfect outcome fails a (strong) local stability property. The evolutionary system imposes a forward induction requirement that strengthens van Damme's; it selects announcement proof equilibria in a class of cheap talk games; and it yields refinement results in some signaling games. The evolutionary model thus yields results that would often be interpreted as satisfying forward induction, but does not always impose sufficient discipline on actions and conjectures at unreached subgames to yield results consistent with backward induction.
Download InfoTo our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University of Bonn, Germany in its series Discussion Paper Serie B with number 216.
Length: 37 pages
Date of creation: Jun 1992
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Bonn Graduate School of Economics, University of Bonn, Adenauerallee 24 - 26, 53113 Bonn, Germany
Fax: +49 228 73 6884
Web page: http://www.bgse.uni-bonn.de/index.php?id=517
Other versions of this item:
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Michihiro Kandori & Rafael Rob, 1997.
"Bandwagon effects and long run technology choice,"
Levine's Working Paper Archive
1265, David K. Levine.
- Weibull, Jörgen W., 1992. "An Introduction to Evolutionary Game Theory," Working Paper Series 347, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
- Nöldeke, Georg & Larry Samuelson, 1994.
"Learning to signal in markets,"
Discussion Paper Serie B
271, University of Bonn, Germany.
- Banerjee, Abhijit & Weibull, Jörgen W., 1992. "Evolution and Rationality: Some Recent Game-Theoretic Results," Working Paper Series 345, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
- Andreas Blume & Douglas V. DeJong & George R. Neumann & N. E. Savin, 2002. "Learning and communication in sender-receiver games: an econometric investigation," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 225-247.
- Blume, Andreas & Dieckmann, Tone, 1998.
"Learning to Communicate in Cheap-Talk Games,"
98-12, University of Iowa, Department of Economics.
- Andreas Blume, 1996.
"Information Transmission and Preference Similarity,"
Game Theory and Information
- Blume, A., 1996. "Information Transmission and Preference Similarity," Working Papers 96-04, University of Iowa, Department of Economics.
- Blume, A., 1997. "Information Transmission and Preference Similarity," Working Papers 97-11, University of Iowa, Department of Economics.
- Andreas Blume, 1995. "Information Transmission and Preference Similarity," Game Theory and Information 9504002, EconWPA, revised 29 May 1996.
- Blume, A., 1997. "Information Transmission and Preference Similarity," Discussion Paper 1997-66, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (BGSE Office).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.