The paper analyzes the canonical hold-up model of Hart and Moore (1988) under the assumption that the courts can verify delivery of the good by the seller. We show that the first best can be achieved using simple "option contracts" which give the seller the right to decide whether or not trade takes place. Our result does not rely on "renegotiation design" but takes the renegotiation game as exogenously given. Furthermore, we characterize an interesting class of cases in which renegotiation is unnecessary to achieve the first best.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Bonn, Germany in its series Discussion Paper Serie A with number
417.
Length: 18 pages Date of creation: Feb 1992 Date of revision:
Aug 1993 Handle: RePEc:bon:bonsfa:417
Contact details of provider: Postal: Bonn Graduate School of Economics, University of Bonn, Adenauerallee 24 - 26, 53113 Bonn, Germany Fax: +49 228 73 9221 Web page: http://www.bgse.uni-bonn.de/index.php?id=517
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Daniel Park).
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.) This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.