Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Ordered probit models with anchoring vignette

Contents:

Author Info

  • Claudio Rossetti

    ()
    (Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”)

Abstract

This paper presents a new Stata command for the estimation of ordered probit models with individual-specific thresholds, where anchoring vignettes are used to correct for differences in response scales. The analysis of ordered response data is very common in many research areas. Surveys in the social sciences very often have questions on individuals’ subjective evaluations of their own situation or what they think about a certain aspect of society. Nevertheless, when respondents use the ordinal response categories of standard survey questions in different ways, the validity of analyses based on the resulting data can be biased. Anchoring vignettes is a survey design technique that may be used to position self-reported responses on a common, interpersonally comparable scale. The model I present here is a parametric ordered probit model for the self-assessments, where the individual-specific thresholds depend on the same set of covariates as in the ordered probit model for the responses to the vignettes (King et al. 2004). Furthermore, I allow for the possibility of controlling for unobserved heterogeneity in response scales by including a random individual effect in the thresholds. The model is estimated by maximum likelihood. The new Stata command presented here takes advantage of the new technology available in Stata 10. Specifically, the maximization routine is written in Mata, the matrix programming language of Stata, and the new Mata function optimize() is employed to maximize the likelihood function; this results in very fast convergence. After a brief description of the ordered probit models with individual specific thresholds and anchoring vignettes, I describe the new Stata command for fitting such models and present an empirical application.

Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Stata Users Group in its series Italian Stata Users' Group Meetings 2008 with number 02.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 19 Jan 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:boc:isug08:02

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.stata.com/meeting/italy08/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Franco Peracchi & Claudio Rossetti, 2009. "Gender and regional differences in self-rated health in Europe," CEIS Research Paper 142, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 30 Sep 2009.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:isug08:02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.