IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_604_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

TLAC-eligible debt: who holds it? A view from the euro area

Author

Listed:
  • Carmela Aurora Attinà

    (Bank of Italy)

  • Pierluigi Bologna

    (Bank of Italy)

Abstract

We identify two categories of potentially ‘bad investors’ in TLAC-eligible bonds for the purpose of bail-in, i.e. households and hedge funds. The exposure of households may create political economy problems for policy makers when they have to decide about bail-in, while holdings by hedge funds may increase the price volatility of these instruments in stress periods. We analyze the composition of the investor base of the TLAC bonds issued by euro area G-SIBs between 2013 and 2020 and make a first assessment of whether the observed developments could have lessened the above mentioned problems. We show that the composition of the holdings of the different sectors has changed significantly over time. The share directly held by households has declined, is low on aggregate, and should not necessarily be an obstacle to the resolution of a G-SIB. However, there is a negative correlation between households’ TLAC holdings and their financial education. The information gap around the holdings of hedge funds means a full assessment of their role is not feasible. The market tensions that followed the Covid-19 shock did not negatively affect investments in TLAC debt, except for those of households which fell markedly in the first half of 2020.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmela Aurora Attinà & Pierluigi Bologna, 2021. "TLAC-eligible debt: who holds it? A view from the euro area," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 604, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_604_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2021-0604/QEF_604_21.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ansgar Walther & Lucy White & Itay Goldstein, 2020. "Rules versus Discretion in Bank Resolution," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(12), pages 5594-5629.
    2. Tim Eisert & Christian Eufinger, 2019. "Interbank Networks and Backdoor Bailouts: Benefiting from Other Banks’ Government Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3673-3693, August.
    3. Claudia Pigrum & Thomas Reininger & Caroline Stern, 2016. "Bail-in: who invests in noncovered debt securities issued by euro area banks?," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 32, pages 101-119.
    4. Emmanuel Farhi & Jean Tirole, 2012. "Collective Moral Hazard, Maturity Mismatch, and Systemic Bailouts," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 60-93, February.
    5. Beck, Thorsten & Radev, Dayen & Schnabel, Isabel, 2020. "Bank Resolution Regimes and Systemic Risk," CEPR Discussion Papers 14724, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Valerio Della Corte & Stefano Federico, 2016. "Foreign holders of Italian government debt securities: new evidence," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 363, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    7. Rafael Repullo, 2005. "Liquidity, Risk Taking, and the Lender of Last Resort," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 1(2), September.
    8. de Bondt, Gabe & Gieseck, Arne & Tujula, Mika, 2020. "Household wealth and consumption in the euro area," Economic Bulletin Articles, European Central Bank, vol. 1.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pär Holmbäck Adelwald, 2021. "From bailout to bail‐in: Making banking a legitimate part of the market economy," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3), pages 430-441, October.
    2. Martijn Boermans, 2022. "A literature review of securities holdings statistics research and a practitioner’s guide," Working Papers 757, DNB.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martien Lamers & Thomas Present & Nicolas Soenen & Rudi Vander Vennet, 2023. "Does BRRD mitigate the bank-to-sovereign risk channel?," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 23/1060, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Lorenzo Pandolfi, 2022. "Bail-in and Bailout: Friends or Foes?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1450-1468, February.
    3. Martynova, Natalya & Perotti, Enrico C. & Suárez, Javier, 2020. "Bank capital forbearance and serial gambling," Discussion Papers 56/2020, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    4. Beck, Thorsten & Radev, Dayen & Schnabel, Isabel, 2020. "Bank Resolution Regimes and Systemic Risk," CEPR Discussion Papers 14724, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. König, Philipp Johann & Mayer, Paul & Pothier, David, 2022. "Optimal timing of policy interventions in troubled banks," Discussion Papers 10/2022, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    6. Keister, Todd & Mitkov, Yuliyan, 2023. "Allocating losses: Bail-ins, bailouts and bank regulation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    7. Kahn, Charles M. & Wagner, Wolf, 2021. "Sources of Liquidity and Liquidity Shortages," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    8. Hoerova, Marie & Mendicino, Caterina & Nikolov, Kalin & Schepens, Glenn & Heuvel, Skander Van den, 2018. "Benefits and costs of liquidity regulation," Working Paper Series 2169, European Central Bank.
    9. Martynova, Natalya & Perotti, Enrico & Suarez, Javier, 2022. "Capital forbearance in the bank recovery and resolution game," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 884-904.
    10. Allen N. Berger & Charles P. Himmelberg & Raluca A. Roman & Sergey Tsyplakov, 2022. "Bank bailouts, bail‐ins, or no regulatory intervention? A dynamic model and empirical tests of optimal regulation and implications for future crises," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(4), pages 1031-1090, December.
    11. Simona Nistor & Steven Ongena, 2023. "The Impact of Policy Interventions on Systemic Risk across Banks," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 64(2), pages 155-206, October.
    12. Lorenzo Pandolfi, 2018. "Bail-in vs. Bailout: a False Dilemma?," CSEF Working Papers 499, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    13. Santos, João A.C. & Suarez, Javier, 2019. "Liquidity standards and the value of an informed lender of last resort," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 351-368.
    14. Altavilla, Carlo & Fernandes, Cecilia Melo & Ongena, Steven & Scopelliti, Alessandro, 2022. "Bank bond holdings and bail-in regulatory changes: evidence from euro area security registers," Working Paper Series 2758, European Central Bank.
    15. Bruche, Max & Segura, Anatoli, 2017. "Debt maturity and the liquidity of secondary debt markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 599-613.
    16. Ricardo J. Caballero & Emmanuel Farhi & Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, 2017. "The Safe Assets Shortage Conundrum," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(3), pages 29-46, Summer.
    17. Schaeck, K. & Silva Buston, C.F. & Wagner, W.B., 2013. "The Two Faces of Interbank Correlation," Discussion Paper 2013-077, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    18. Hirano, Tomohiro & Inaba, Masaru & Yanagawa, Noriyuki, 2015. "Asset bubbles and bailouts," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(S), pages 71-89.
    19. S. Gabrieli & C.-P. Georg, 2014. "A network view on interbank market freezes," Working papers 531, Banque de France.
    20. Suarez, Javier & Sánchez Serrano, Antonio, 2018. "Approaching non-performing loans from a macroprudential angle," Report of the Advisory Scientific Committee 7, European Systemic Risk Board.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bail-in; TLAC; resolution; G-SIB; Covid-19;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G5 - Financial Economics - - Household Finance

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_604_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdigvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.