Opening the Black Box of PU: An IS Approach to Defining and Measuring Usefulness
AbstractIn direct response to a call made by Benbasat and Barki (2007), this paper re-examines a core construct in IS adoption studies, perceived usefulness. The construct is critiqued and a proposal made for re-defining it as an attribute of what is termed a user-system pair. This is distinct from approaches taken in other disciplines, and fits well within a systems view. It therefore can be considered as IS theory. The inclusion of the user is crucial and sets the use within the context of a goal - usefulness has no meaning without this. Usefulness then is a binary state which the user-system pair either has or does not have. Measuring usefulness comes down to measuring the attainment of goals. The implications of this for our field are discussed. It is particularly relevant for our field as this approach is well suited to studying information systems and is distinct from approaches taken in other fields, notably psychology.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by International Centre for Behavioural Business Research in its series ICBBR Working Papers with number 8.
Date of creation: 02 Mar 2010
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Jubilee Campus, Nottingham NG2 8BB
Phone: +44-115-846 66 02
Fax: +44-115-846 66 67
Web page: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/
More information through EDIRC
IS; Perceived Usefulness; User-system pair;
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laure Cabantous).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.