This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Monitoring versus Gatekeeping

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Arup Daripa (School of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics, Birkbeck)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

We study alternative mechanisms facing adverse selection and moral hazard, as well as the problems of collusion and free-riding, which are often ignored in the literature. We derive the optimal monitoring mechanism and show that it solves free riding and collusion problems. However, with different types of agents, the optimal mechanism needs to also solve an “assignment problem,” which, coupled with the need to generate incentive for monitoring, prevents the optimal monitoring mechanism from attaining full second best efficiency. The paper then considers an alternative mechanism in which some agents are simply given gatekeeping powers: they can either allow or block any investment project. The mechanism allows rent extraction through side payments from investors to the gatekeepers. A gatekeeping mechanism with competing gatekeepers attains first best efficiency, and is also proof against collusion between investors and gatekeepers by construction. We show that the crucial issue for the success of monitoring is whether monitors can be penalized for false reporting. Without this assumption monitoring reduces to gatekeeping. Further, the crucial assumption for gatekeeping to succeed is that gatekeepers behave in a competitive manner. The results provide an explanation for the observed institutional choices: monitoring is typical in informal collectives, whereas government regulation of investment (licensing, issuing permits etc) leads naturally to gatekeeping.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.ems.bbk.ac.uk/research/wp/PDF/BWPEF0715.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First version, 2007
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Birkbeck, School of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics in its series Birkbeck Working Papers in Economics and Finance with number 0715.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Sep 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:bbk:bbkefp:0715

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Malet St.,London WC1E 7HX, UK
Phone: 44-20- 76316428
Fax: 44-20- 76316416
Web page: http://www.ems.bbk.ac.uk/

Order Information:
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: Monitoring Gatekeeping Informal credit collective Licensing Collusion Free riding in monitoring Corruption

Find related papers by JEL classification:
O12 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information
D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy-Making and Implementation

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? There are over 16000 authors registered on RePEc Author Service.

This page was last updated on 2008-8-16.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.