Evaluating administrative burdens through SCM: some indications from the Italian experience
AbstractA methodology to measure administrative burdens, based on the Dutch Standard Cost Model (SCM), has been applied in a large number of European countries, coupled in most cases with the commitment to a reduction target. This paper compares the application of the method in different national context and discusses its weaknesses and strengths against more complete forms of evaluation of the adequacy of regulation. The paper also discusses some indication arisen during the measurement of administrative burdens through SCM in Italy. Our main conclusion is that the SCM is a potentially useful tool and could provide motivation for culture change in policymaking. Its major strength, which lies mainly in its pragmatic approach and the possibility of commitment on a quantitative target, may be at the same time a source of weakness and may deliver some misleading results. Also some basic concepts of the model need a more rigorous definition to be consistently applied in different countries.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Metodi Matematici - Università di Bari in its series series with number 0023.
Date of creation: Apr 2009
Date of revision: Apr 2009
administrative burdens; better regulation; costs of regulation; European governance; standard cost model;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2009-05-30 (All new papers)
- NEP-EEC-2009-05-30 (European Economics)
- NEP-REG-2009-05-30 (Regulation)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Michele Cincera & Olivia Galgau, 2005.
"Impact of Market Entry and Exit on EU Productivity and Growth Performance,"
- Michele Cincera, 2004. "Impact of market entry and exit on EU productivity and growth performance," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/921, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Michele Cincera & Olivia Galgau, 2005. "Impact of market entry and exit on EU productivity and growth performance," European Economy - Economic Papers 222, Directorate General Economic and Monetary Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
- Robert W. Hahn & Robert E. Litan, 2005.
"Counting Regulatory Benefits and Costs: Lessons for the US and Europe,"
Journal of International Economic Law,
Oxford University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 473-508, June.
- Hahn, Robert W. & Litan, Robert E., 2004. "Counting Regulatory Benefits and Costs: Lessons for the U.S. and Europe," Working paper 167, Regulation2point0.
- Giuseppe Coco, 2007. "La misurazione degli oneri amministrativi tramite Standard Cost Model," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2007(1-2), pages 37-52.
- Luca Barbone & Richard M. Bird & Jaime Vazquez-Caro, 2012.
"The Costs of VAT: A Review of the Literature,"
International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU
paper1222, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ruggiero Marco Paolillo).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.