We study the problem of ranking sets of options in terms of freedom of choice. We propose a framework in which both the diversity of the options and the preferences of the agent over the options do play a role. We formulate some axioms that re°ect these two aspects of freedom and we study their logical implications. Two di®erent criteria for ranking sets are characterized, which generalize some of the rankings proposed so far in the literature.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche - Università di Bari in its series series with number
0003.
Length: 17 Date of creation: Date of revision: Handle: RePEc:bai:series:wp0003
Note: We thank Carmen Herrero and partecipants to the Conference on "The analysis and the measurement of freedom", Palermo (Italy), for helpful comments.Vito Peragine acknowledges financial support from the EU TMR network "LivinTax" (Contract n. ERBFMRXCT980248) and the MIUR, Italy (research project on The Analysis and Measurement of Freedom"). Romero{Medina acknowledges financial support from DGICYT, project PB 98-024. Contact details of provider: Postal: Via Camillo Rosalba, 53 - 70124 - Bari ITALY Phone: +390805049042 Fax: +390805049149 Web page: http://www.dse.uniba.it More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ruggiero Marco Paolillo).
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
BOSSERT, Walter & PATTANAIK, Prasanta K. & XU, Yongsheng, 2001.
"The Measurement of Diversity,"
Cahiers de recherche
2001-17, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)