Locating Public Facilities by Majority: Stability, Consistency and Group Formation
AbstractWe consider the following allocation problem: A fixed number of public facilities must be located on a line. Society is composed of N agents, who must be allocated to one and only one of these facilities. Agents have single peaked preferences over the possible location of the facilities they are assigned to, and do not care about the location of the rest of facilities. There is no congestion. We show that there exist social choice correspondences that choose locations and assign agents to them in such a way that: (1) these decisions are Condorcet winners whenever one exists, (2) the majority of the users of each facility supports the choice of its location, and (3) no agent wishes to become a user of another facility, even if that could induce a change of its present location by majority voting.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC) in its series UFAE and IAE Working Papers with number 557.02.
Date of creation: 01 Dec 2002
Date of revision: 01 Mar 2004
Social choice correspondences; condorcet rules; stability; Simpson Rule;
Other versions of this item:
- Barbera, Salvador & Bevia, Carmen, 2006. "Locating public facilities by majority: Stability, consistency and group formation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 185-200, July.
- Salvador Barberà & Carmen Bevia, 2002. "Locating Public Facilities by Majority: Stability, Consistency and Group Formation," Working Papers 128, Barcelona Graduate School of Economics.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Tayfun Sönmez & Suryapratim Banerjee & Hideo Konishi, 2001.
"Core in a simple coalition formation game,"
Social Choice and Welfare,
Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 135-153.
- Barbera, Salvador & Bevia, Carmen, 2002.
"Self-Selection Consistent Functions,"
Journal of Economic Theory,
Elsevier, vol. 105(2), pages 263-277, August.
- Bogomolnaia, Anna & Jackson, Matthew O., 2002. "The Stability of Hedonic Coalition Structures," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 201-230, February.
- Igal Milchtaich & Eyal Winter, 2000.
"Stability and Segregation in Group Formation,"
Discussion Paper Series
dp263, The Center for the Study of Rationality, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
- Biung-Ghi Ju, 2007.
"Efficiency and Consistency for Locating Multiple Public Facilities,"
Discussion Paper Series
0716, Institute of Economic Research, Korea University.
- Ju, Biung-Ghi, 2008. "Efficiency and consistency for locating multiple public facilities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 165-183, January.
- Biung-Ghi Ju, 2005. "Efficiency and Consistency for Locating Multiple Public Facilities," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 200507, University of Kansas, Department of Economics, revised Feb 2005.
- Masashi Umezawa, 2012. "The replacement principle for the provision of multiple public goods on tree networks," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 211-235, February.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Xavier Vila).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.