By mid 2004, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is epected to launch its final recommendations on minimum capital requirements in the banking industry. Although there is the intention to arrive at capital charges which concur with economic intuition, the risk weight formulas proposed by the committee will lack an adequate treatment of concentration risks in credit portfolios. The question arises whether this problem can be solved without recourse to fully-fledged portfolio models. Since recent practical experience shows that the risk measure Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) is particularly well suited for detecting concentrations, we develop the semi-asymptotic approach by Emmer and Tasche in the CVaR context and compare it with the capital charges recently suggested by the Basel Committee. Both approaches are based on the same Vasicek one-factor model.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (arXiv administrators).
Related research
Keywords:
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: