The social costs of an MTBE ban in California (Condensed version)
AbstractA careful analysis of the costs and benefits of using MTBE as a fuel oxygenate, as compared to use of its most reasonable substitutes, finds that the net private and social costs of MTBE' s alternatives are substantially higher than those of MTBE. The expected costs of future MTBE use have been revised downwards as a result of the state of California's successful program to replace and monitor underground fuel storage tanks, as well as more complete estimates of the incremental clean up costs from MTBE contamination. Moreover, as California has begun to seriously consider the logistics and costs of removing MTBE from gasoline, it has become clear that the cost of MTBE alternatives is higher than previously anticipated. In light of the information that has come to light since California's 1999 decision to phase out MTBE use by 2003, that decision may merit revisiting.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University of California at Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy in its series CUDARE Working Paper Series with number 931.
Length: 54 pages
Date of creation: 2002
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 207 Giannini Hall #3310, Berkeley, CA 94720-3310
Phone: (510) 642-3345
Fax: (510) 643-8911
Web page: http://areweb.berkeley.edu/library/Main/CUDARE
More information through EDIRC
Postal: University of California, Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics Library, 248 Giannini Hall #3310, Berkeley CA 94720-3310
Other versions of this item:
- Rausser, Gordon C. & Adams, Gregory D. & Montgomery, W. David & Smith, Anne E., 2002. "The social costs of an MTBE ban in California (Condensed version)," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt59s1j0fq, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jeff Cole).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.