Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info

Paper provided by University of California at Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy in its series CUDARE Working Paper Series with number 792.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 47 pages
Date of creation: 1985
Date of revision: 1996
Publication status: Published in Valuing recreation and the environment: revealed preference methods in theory and practice, ed. by Joseph A. Herriges and Catherine L. Kling. New horizons in environmental economics. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Elgar; distributed by American international distribution corporation, Williston, VT, 1999, p.33-64
Handle: RePEc:are:cudare:792

Note: This paper was originally produced, August 1985
Contact details of provider:
Postal: 207 Giannini Hall #3310, Berkeley, CA 94720-3310
Phone: (510) 642-3345
Fax: (510) 643-8911
Email:
Web page: http://are.berkeley.edu/library/CUDARE/workpap.html
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Postal: University of California, Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics Library, 248 Giannini Hall #3310, Berkeley CA 94720-3310
Email:

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research

Keywords: Consumers' preferences; Probabilities; Probit models; Regression analysis;

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

1. Emily Lancsar, 2002. "Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48," Discussion Papers 48, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney. [Downloadable!]
2. Emily Lancsar & Jordan Louviere, 2006. "Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(8), pages 797-811. [Downloadable!]

Did you know? The yearly budget of IDEAS is exactly $0: it relies entirely on volunteer work.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-16.