This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Using Stratified Sampling Methods To Improve Percentile Estimates In The Context of Risk Measurement

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Neil Hereford () (Australian Prudential Regulation Authority)
Geoffrey Shuetrim () (Australian Prudential Regulation Authority)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Risk measurement is often based on tail percentiles of distributions that are too complex to estimate without resorting to simulation methods. Too often, these simulation methods require enormous computational effort to generate sufficient data points for precise inference about the distribution tails. This paper explores the efficiency benefits that can be derived by applying stratified sampling to these risk-measurement problems. Observations that are close to the percentile of interest are over-sampled and observations that are far away from the percentile of interest are under-sampled. This is shown to dramatically improve the quality of percentile estimates while simultaneously reducing the computational burden. This paper also explores a method of sampling from non-parametric distribution estimates. The ability to generate random draws from such distribution estimates is a key prerequisite for solving the types of simulation problems associated with credit and operational risk measurement.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.apra.gov.au/RePEc/RePEcDocs/Archive/working_papers/wp0005.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Australian Prudential Regulation Authority in its series Working Papers with number wp0005.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 01 Jun 2000
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:apr:aprewp:wp0005

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 400 George Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
Phone: +61 (0)2 9210 3000
Fax: +61 (0)2 9210 3022
Web page: http://www.apra.gov.au/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Justin Harding).

Related research
Keywords: Monte-Carlo Simulation Stratified Sampling Risk Measurment

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: General

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Crouhy, Michel & Galai, Dan & Mark, Robert, 2000. "A comparative analysis of current credit risk models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(1-2), pages 59-117, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Data contributors to RePEc receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-15.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.