IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ant/wpaper/2006005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of data from nonorthogonal multi-stratum designs

Author

Listed:
  • GILMOUR, Steven G.
  • GOOS, Peter

Abstract

Split-plot and other multi-stratum structures are widely used in factorial and response surface experiments and residual maximum likelihood (REML) and generalized least squares (GLS) estimation is seen as the state-of-the-art method of data analysis for nonorthogonal designs. We analyze data from an experiment run to study the effects of five process factors on the drying rate for freeze dried coffee and find that the main-plot variance component is estimated to be zero. We show that this is a typical property of REML-GLS estimation which is highly undesirable and can give misleading conclusions. In the classical approach, it is possible to fix the main-plot variance at some positive value, but this is not satisfactory either. Instead, we recommend a Bayesian analysis, using an informative prior distribution for the main-plot variance component and implemented using Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling. Paradoxically, the Bayesian analysis is less dependent on prior assumptions than the REML-GLS analysis. Bayesian analyses of the coffee freeze drying data give more realistic conclusions than REML-GLS analysis, providing support for our recommendation.

Suggested Citation

  • GILMOUR, Steven G. & GOOS, Peter, 2006. "Analysis of data from nonorthogonal multi-stratum designs," Working Papers 2006005, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2006005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docman/irua/fd4aa5/5792f7c5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bayesian methods; Coffee; Effective degrees of freedom; Freeze drying; Generalized least squares; Likelihood; MCMC; REML; Split-plot experiment;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ant:wpaper:2006005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joeri Nys (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ftufsbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.