Many developing countries pursue policies that treat large and small firms differently. For example, large firms may be subject to a value added tax while small firms are explicitly exempted. Moreover, governments often find it impractical to collect taxes from the smallest enterprises; this may increase the tax burden for larger firms, whose compliance can be enforced. Such policies clearly affect the size distribution of firms. But how great is the impact on macro variables? How large are the resulting inefficiencies? And what are the dynamic effects on capital accumulation and economic growth? This paper uses a dynamic general equilibrium variant of the Lucas (1978) span-of-control model to address such questions. The model is matched to data from the Ghanaian manufacturing sector. As a policy experiment, alternative tax and regulatory regimes are compared. The model shows that a policy disproportionately penalizing large firms can reduce output by nearly one-half, compared with an alternative policy regime in which all firms face the same taxes and regulatory costs.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Minnesota, Economic Development Center in its series Bulletins with number
7488.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)