Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Review of Methods Used to Evaluate Returns to Agricultural Research

Contents:

Author Info

  • Norton, George W.
  • Davis, Jeffrey S.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/49016
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station in its series Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 with number 49016.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 1980
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ags:umae08:49016

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.maes.umn.edu/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies;

Other versions of this item:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Ruttan, Vernon W., 1978. "Bureaucratic Productivity: The Case Of Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13911, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
  2. Richard R. Nelson, 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67, pages 297.
  3. Sarhangi, R.F. & Logan, J. & Duncan, Ronald C. & Hagan, Philip, 1977. "Who Benefits From Agricultural Research: Comment," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(04), December.
  4. te Kloot, Jack H. & Anderson, Jock R., 1977. "Estimation Of Technological Change In The Pastoral Zone," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(04), December.
  5. Duncan, R & Tisdell, Clem, 1971. "Research and Technical Progress: The Returns to Producers," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 47(117), pages 124-29, March.
  6. White, Fred C. & Havlicek, Joseph, Jr., 1979. "Rates Of Return To Agricultural Research And Extension In The Southern Region," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(02), December.
  7. Scobie, Grant M., 1976. "Who Benefits From Agricultural Research?," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(04), December.
  8. Peterson, Willis L., 1978. "Returns To Investment In Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13591, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
  9. Easter, K. William & Norton, George W., 1977. "Potential Returns From Increased Research Budget For The Land Grant Universities," Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, issue 4.
  10. A. B. Apdarawewa, 1969. "Evaluation of Public Research Programs in Agriculture," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 17(3), pages 157-169, November.
  11. Mohr, Graeme M., 1977. "Agricultural Research And The Returns To Consumers," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(04), December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Rausser, Gordon C. & de Janvry, Alain & Schmitz, Andrew & Zilberman, David, 1980. "Principal issues in the evaluation of public research in agriculture," CUDARE Working Paper Series 86, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy.
  2. Sundquist, W. Burt & Cheng, Cheng-Ge, 1980. "Measuring Returns to Research Expenditures for Corn, Wheat and Soybeans," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49022, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
  3. Rausser, Gordon C. & Zilberman, David D., 1981. "Public research in agriculture: an alternative institutional framework," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt1b73b3jj, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
  4. Evenson, Robert E., 1980. "Research Evaluation: Policy Interests and the State of the Art," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49067, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
  5. Brazzel, John M., 1980. "Evaluation of Agricultural Research: Program Evaluation Methods and Approaches," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49017, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
  6. Lu, Yao-Chi, 1980. "Ex Ante Evaluation of the Separate Effects of Research and Extension," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49074, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
  7. Vere, David T. & Sinden, Jack A. & Campbell, M.H., 1980. "Social Benefits of Serrated Tussock Control in New South Wales," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(03), December.
  8. Norton, George W. & Schuh, G. Edward, 1980. "Evaluating Returns to Social Science Research: Issues and Possible Methods," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49076, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
  9. Leholm, Arlen G. & Supalla, Raymond J. & Vollmar, Glen, 1980. "A Methodology for Measuring Potential Benefits from Drought-Oriented Research in Nebraska," Evaluation of Agricultural Research, Proceedings of a Workshop, Minneapolis, MN, May 12-13, 1980, Miscellaneous Publication 8 49073, University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station.
  10. Sundquist, W. Burt & Cheng, Cheng-Ge & Norton, George W., 1980. "Measuring The Returns To Agricultural Experiment Station Research Expenditures For Corn, Wheat And Soybeans," Staff Papers 13356, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umae08:49016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.