IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/34067.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Road Ahead: Agricultural Policy Reform In The Wto -- Summary Report

Author

Listed:
  • Burfisher, Mary E.

Abstract

Agricultural trade barriers and producer subsidies inflict real costs, both on the countriesvthat use these policies and on their trade partners. Trade barriers lower demand for trade partners' products, domestic subsidies can induce an oversupply of agricultural products which depresses world prices, and export subsidies create increased competition for producers in other countries. Eliminating global agricultural policy distortions would result in an annual world welfare gain of $56 billion. High protection for agricultural commodities in the form of tariffs continues to be the major factor restricting world trade. In 2000, World Trade Organization (WTO) members continued global negotiations on agricultural policy reform. To help policymakers and others realize what is at stake in the global agricultural negotiations, this report quantifies the costs of global agricultural distortions and the potential benefits of their full elimination. It also analyzes the effects on U.S. and world agriculture if only partial reform is achieved in liberalizing tariffs, tariff-rate quotas (limits on imported goods), domestic support, and export subsidies.

Suggested Citation

  • Burfisher, Mary E., 2001. "The Road Ahead: Agricultural Policy Reform In The Wto -- Summary Report," Agricultural Economic Reports 34067, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:34067
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.34067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/34067/files/ae010797.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.34067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gloria O. Pasadilla, 2007. "Preferential trading agreements and agricultural liberalization in East and South-East Asia," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: Studies in Trade and Investment - AGRICULTURAL TRADE - PLANTING THE SEEDS OF REGIONAL LIBERALIZATION IN ASIA, volume 60, pages 75-130, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    2. Beckman, Jayson, 2021. "Reforming Market Access in Agricultural Trade: Tariff Removal and the Trade Facilitation Agreement," USDA Miscellaneous 310408, United States Department of Agriculture.
    3. Surabhi Mittal & Jeffrey J. Reimer, 2008. "Would Indian farmers benefit from liberalization of world cotton and sugar markets?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 38(3), pages 301-312, May.
    4. Beckman, Jayson & Dyck, John & Heerman, Kari, 2017. "The Global Landscape of Agricultural Trade, 1995-2014," Economic Information Bulletin 265270, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Oskam, Arie J. & Meester, Gerrit, 2006. "How useful is the PSE in determining agricultural support?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 123-141, April.
    6. Laborde, David & Le Cacheux, Jacques, 2003. "Price and Welfare Effects of Agricultural Liberalization with Imperfect Competition in Food Industries and Trade," Conference papers 331155, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Gordillo de Anda, Gustavo, 2004. "Food security and family farming," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    8. Nilson de Paula & Huáscar Pessali, 2014. "Agricultural Trade Negotiations and the Challenges of Food Security," Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy, Centre for Agrarian Research and Education for South, vol. 3(3), pages 313-335, December.
    9. Katherine Smith Evans & Mary Bohman, 2022. "Women agricultural economists in federal agencies: Making a difference," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 54-70, March.
    10. repec:got:cegedp:67 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Chaddad, Fabio R. & Aguilar, Patricia & Jank, Marcos S., 2005. "Agrifood Market Integration: Perspectives from Developing Countries," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 163860, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    12. Surabhi Mittal, 2007. "OECD Agricultural Trade Reforms Impact on India's Prices and Producers Welfare," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 195, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    13. John C. Beghin & David Roland-Holst & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2002. "Global Agricultural Trade and the Doha Round: What are the Implications for North and South?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 02-wp308, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    14. Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Beghin, John C. & de Cara, Stephane & Fang, Cheng & Isik, Murat & Matthey, Holger, 2003. "Agricultural Markets Liberalization And The Doha Round," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25875, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Salamon, P.B. & Herok, C.A., 2002. "Was bringen mögliche Ergebnisse der WTO-Verhandlungen und der Osterweiterung für den Milchmarkt?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    16. Devadoss, Stephen, 2002. "Domestic Support And Wto Negotiations From Developing Countries' Perspectives," 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California 36667, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    17. Keith Walsh & Martina Brockmeier & Alan Matthews, 2005. "Implications of Domestic Support Disciplines for Further Agricultural Trade Liberalization," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp99, IIIS.
    18. Tsai, Diana, 2002. "Environmental Policy and Technological Innovation: Evidence from Taiwan Manufacturing Industries," Conference papers 331005, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Hess, Sebastian & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2007. "Assessing general and partial equilibrium simulations of Doha round outcomes using meta-analysis," University of Göttingen Working Papers in Economics 67, University of Goettingen, Department of Economics.
    20. Eidman, Vernon R., 2002. "The 2002 Farm Bill: A Step Forward Or A Step Backward?," Working Papers 14442, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    21. Surabhi MITTAL, 2009. "Will OECD Agricultural Trade Reforms Impact India's Crop Prices and Farmers Welfare?," EcoMod2009 21500067, EcoMod.
    22. Ash, Ken, 2005. "Agricultural Policies in Selected OECD Countries: Opportunities for Reform," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 163859, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    23. Boughanmi, Houcine & Zekri, S. & Opara, L. U. & Al-Hassani, M., 2009. "The Effects of Multilateral Trade Liberalization on Agriculture: The Case of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countries," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(2).
    24. Posh Raj Pandey, 2003. "Agreement on Agriculture: Issues of Market Access for South Asian Countries," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 4(1), pages 19-40, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:34067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.