This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Effects of Alternative Agriculture and Fair Trade on the Development of Producer Groups and Their Members: Case Studies from Northern Thailand

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Renner, Miriam
Adamowicz, Wiktor
Abstract

This study examines the economic, social and environmental effects of alternative agricultural methods, traded through fair trade mechanisms, on producers in northern Thailand. These effects are compared with those of conventional agriculture and mixed agriculture (where alternative agriculture and conventional agriculture are practised on the same farm). The chosen research projects and areas in Chiang Mai province, Thailand were the government alternative agriculture project at Village Three in Pong Yang, and the nongovernmental organisations alternative agriculture project at San Pay Yang and the neighbouring San Lueng. The government and non-governmental organisations involved in the extension and marketing of alternative agriculture are outlined and associated labelling and certification issues are addressed. Economic comparisons found that alternative agriculture is a viable economic alternative to conventional agriculture and mixed agriculture when non-farm income and home consumption are included. However, the larger average size of alternative agriculture farms and the external funding of the organisations involved with alternative agriculture, must also be considered. Social comparisons indicated that alternative agriculture results in educational and health benefits when compared to conventional agriculture. Environmental comparisons showed that on average alternative agriculture has the highest level of crop and livestock integration, the lowest number of artificial agricultural inputs used, and the highest number of alternatives to artificial inputs applied.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/24114
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Alberta, Department of Rural Economy in its series Staff Paper Series with number 24114.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 1998
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ags:ualbsp:24114

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 515 General Services Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AlbertaT6G 2H1
Phone: (780) 492-4225
Fax: (780) 492-0268
Email:
Web page: http://www.re.ualberta.ca/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (AgEcon Search).

Related research
Keywords: Institutional and Behavioral Economics;

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS uses the data collected within the RePEc project, the largest online bibliographic database in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-26.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.