IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/tugdwp/15569.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Analysis in Environmental Reviews of Trade Agreements: Assessing the North American Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Ney, Luke
  • Ackerman, Frank
  • Gallagher, Kevin P.

Abstract

Beginning in the late 1990s, Canada and the United States began requiring "Environmental Reviews (ERs)" of all trade agreements to be negotiated by each government. This paper, commissioned by the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation, outlines how ERs have evolved in North America, and evaluates the different methodological approaches that have been employed in ERs thus far. We show that the ERs conducted to date have an encouraging number of strengths that can be built upon. However, we also establish that the art of conducting ERs is still in its infancy. We identify four limitations with the methodological approaches that have been employed in the most recent ERs. Based on an analysis of these limitations, we propose four ways to improve how ERs are conducted in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ney, Luke & Ackerman, Frank & Gallagher, Kevin P., 2002. "Economic Analysis in Environmental Reviews of Trade Agreements: Assessing the North American Experience," Working Papers 15569, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:tugdwp:15569
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.15569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/15569/files/wp020001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.15569?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin P. Gallagher, "undated". "Is NACEC a Model Trade and Environment Institution? Lessons from Mexican Industry," GDAE Working Papers 01-08, GDAE, Tufts University.
    2. Frank Ackerman, 2001. "Still dead after all these years: interpreting the failure of general equilibrium theory," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 119-139.
    3. Leonard Waverman, 1992. "Mini-Symposium: Modelling North American Free Trade: Editorial Introduction," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, January.
    4. Frank Ackerman & Kevin Gallagher, "undated". "Trade Liberalization and Pollution Intensive Industries in Developing Countries: A Partial Equilibrium Approach," GDAE Working Papers 00-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    5. Reppelin-Hill, Valerie, 1999. "Trade and Environment: An Empirical Analysis of the Technology Effect in the Steel Industry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 283-301, November.
    6. Jonathan M. Harris, "undated". "Macroeconomic Policy and Sustainability," GDAE Working Papers 01-09, GDAE, Tufts University.
    7. Drusilla K. Brown & Alan V. Deardorff & Robert M. Stern, 2011. "A North American Free Trade Agreement: Analytical Issues and a Computational Assessment," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Robert M Stern (ed.), Comparative Advantage, Growth, And The Gains From Trade And Globalization A Festschrift in Honor of Alan V Deardorff, chapter 40, pages 557-575, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Brown, D.K., 1992. "The Impact of a North American Free Trade Area: Applied General Equilibrium Models," Working Papers 311, Research Seminar in International Economics, University of Michigan.
    9. Kirman, Alan, 1989. "The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 99(395), pages 126-139, Supplemen.
    10. Joseph E. Stiglitz, 2000. "The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(4), pages 1441-1478.
    11. Cooper, Richard N., 2000. "Trade and the environment," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 483-529, October.
    12. Aguayo, Francisco & Gallagher, Kevin P. & Gonzalez, Ana Citlalic, 2001. "Dirt is in the Eye of the Beholder: The World Bank Air Pollution Intensities for Mexico," Working Papers 15576, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    13. Gallagher, Kevin P. & Ackerman, Frank, 2000. "Trade Liberalization and Pollution Intensive Industry in Developing Countries: A Partial Equilibrium Approach," Working Papers 15592, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    14. Kevin P. Gallagher & Francisco Aguayo & Ana Citlalic González, "undated". "Dirt is in the Eye of the Beholder: The World Bank Air Pollution Intensities for Mexico," GDAE Working Papers 01-07, GDAE, Tufts University.
    15. Kevin P. Gallagher & Frank Ackerman & Luke Ney, "undated". "Economic Analysis in Environmental Reviews of Trade Agreements: Assessing the North American Experience," GDAE Working Papers 02-01, GDAE, Tufts University.
    16. A. Reinert, Kenneth & W. Roland-Holst, David, 2001. "NAFTA and Industrial Pollution: Some General Equilibrium Results," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 16, pages 165-179.
    17. Roningen, Vernon & Sullivan, John & Dixit, Praveen, 1991. "Documentation of the Static World Policy Simulation (SWOPSIM) Modeling Framework," Staff Reports 278599, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    18. Hinojosa-Ojeda, Raul & Robinson, Sherman, 1992. "Labor Issues in a North American Free Trade Area," CUDARE Working Papers 198601, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladimír JENÍČEK, 2013. "Sustainable development - indicators," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(2), pages 74-80.
    2. Aguayo, Francisco & Gallagher, Kevin P., 2005. "Economic reform, energy, and development: the case of Mexican manufacturing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 829-837, May.
    3. Neva R. Goodwin, "undated". "Macroeconomics for the Twenty-First Century," GDAE Working Papers 03-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
    4. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Is Economics a Natural Science?," GDAE Working Papers 04-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    5. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Clocks, Creation, and Clarity: Insights on Ethics and Economics from a Feminist Perspective," GDAE Working Papers 03-11, GDAE, Tufts University.
    6. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Rationality and Humanity: A View from Feminist Economics," GDAE Working Papers 05-04, GDAE, Tufts University.
    7. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Beyond Small-Is-Beautiful: A Buddhist and Feminist Analysis of Ethics and Business," GDAE Working Papers 04-01, GDAE, Tufts University.
    8. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Understanding the Farm Problem: Six Common Errors in Presenting Farm Statistics," GDAE Working Papers 05-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
    9. Flores, Regina & Ney, Luke & Gallagher, Kevin P. & Wise, Timothy A. & Ackerman, Frank, 2003. "Free Trade, Corn, and the Environment: Environmental Impacts of US - Mexico Corn Trade Under NAFTA," Working Papers 15604, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    10. Vladimír JENÍČEK, 2013. "Modification of sustainability indicators," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(4), pages 160-166.
    11. Kevin P. Gallagher & Frank Ackerman & Luke Ney, "undated". "Economic Analysis in Environmental Reviews of Trade Agreements: Assessing the North American Experience," GDAE Working Papers 02-01, GDAE, Tufts University.
    12. Kevin P. Gallagher & Robin Taylor, "undated". "International Trade and Air Pollution: The Economic Costs of Air Emissions from Waterborne Commerce Vessels in the United States," GDAE Working Papers 03-08, GDAE, Tufts University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Rationality and Humanity: A View from Feminist Economics," GDAE Working Papers 05-04, GDAE, Tufts University.
    2. Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Understanding the Farm Problem: Six Common Errors in Presenting Farm Statistics," GDAE Working Papers 05-02, GDAE, Tufts University.
    3. Jonathan M. Harris, "undated". "Macroeconomic Policy and Sustainability," GDAE Working Papers 01-09, GDAE, Tufts University.
    4. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Is Economics a Natural Science?," GDAE Working Papers 04-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    5. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Beyond Small-Is-Beautiful: A Buddhist and Feminist Analysis of Ethics and Business," GDAE Working Papers 04-01, GDAE, Tufts University.
    6. Julie A. Nelson, "undated". "Clocks, Creation, and Clarity: Insights on Ethics and Economics from a Feminist Perspective," GDAE Working Papers 03-11, GDAE, Tufts University.
    7. Kevin P. Gallagher & Robin Taylor, "undated". "International Trade and Air Pollution: The Economic Costs of Air Emissions from Waterborne Commerce Vessels in the United States," GDAE Working Papers 03-08, GDAE, Tufts University.
    8. Flores, Regina & Ney, Luke & Gallagher, Kevin P. & Wise, Timothy A. & Ackerman, Frank, 2003. "Free Trade, Corn, and the Environment: Environmental Impacts of US - Mexico Corn Trade Under NAFTA," Working Papers 15604, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    9. Aguayo, Francisco & Gallagher, Kevin P., 2005. "Economic reform, energy, and development: the case of Mexican manufacturing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 829-837, May.
    10. Sven Arndt, 1996. "North American Free Trade: An assessment," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 77-92, January.
    11. Frank Ackerman, 2001. "Still dead after all these years: interpreting the failure of general equilibrium theory," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 119-139.
    12. Kakali Mukhopadhyay & Debesh Chakraborty, 2005. "Is liberalization of trade good for the environment? Evidence from India," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 12(1), pages 109-136, June.
    13. Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2002. "Trade liberalisation and regional integration: the search for large numbers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1-20.
    14. Lewis, Jeffrey D. & Robinson, Sherman & Wang, Zhi, 1995. "Beyond the Uruguay Round: The implications of an Asian free trade area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 35-90.
    15. Kouparitsas, Michael A., 2001. "Should trade barriers be phased-out slowly? A case study of North America," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 23(8), pages 875-900, November.
    16. Anderson, James E. & Yotov, Yoto V., 2016. "Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990–2002," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 279-298.
    17. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2011. "The pure logic of value, profit, interest," MPRA Paper 30853, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Kemp-Benedict, Eric, 2013. "Material needs and aggregate demand," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 16-26.
    19. William C. Gruben & John H. Welch, 1994. "Is NAFTA economic integration?," Economic and Financial Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, issue Q II, pages 35-51.
    20. Xing Yao & Rizwana Yasmeen & Yunong Li & Muhammad Hafeez & Ihtsham Ul Haq Padda, 2019. "Free Trade Agreements and Environment for Sustainable Development: A Gravity Model Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:tugdwp:15569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gdtufus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.