IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saeana/46753.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost/Benefit of Abscission Registration for Citrus Mechanical Harvesting

Author

Listed:
  • Blanco, German
  • Roka, Fritz M.

Abstract

The Florida Department of Citrus (DOC) is spending public funds to register an abscission agent compound (CMNP) with the U.S. EPA as part of its effort to enhance the private benefits associated with citrus mechanical harvesting. An abscission agent application should allow existing harvesting equipment to operate through the entire late season orange harvesting period. When estimating costs and benefits through 2018, the net present value of mechanically harvesting 25,000 acres is between $60.8 and $79.9 million, depending on price, production, and fruit loss scenarios. For any of the scenarios considered, the discounted value of abscission benefits with mechanical harvesting fully pays for the costs of registration and development within four years.

Suggested Citation

  • Blanco, German & Roka, Fritz M., 2009. "Cost/Benefit of Abscission Registration for Citrus Mechanical Harvesting," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46753, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:saeana:46753
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.46753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/46753/files/2009SAEA%20blanco-roka.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.46753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saeana:46753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.