Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Who Buys Food Directly from Producers in the Southeastern United States?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Maples, McKenzie
  • Morgan, Kimberly L.
  • Interis, Matthew G.
  • Harri, Ardian

Abstract

In order to capitalize on potential opportunities to meet market demand for locally-grown foods, farmers need insight into significant motivations and behavioral characteristics of those consumers who have purchased local foods. Furthermore, it is evident that some consumers buy directly from producers based on their desire for “local” food (Thilmany, Bond, and Bond 2008). Local food consumer preferences and motivations potentially differ across regions of the United States and across varying definitions of “local” food. Little research has been done on the local foods sector for the Southeastern United States. Most studies concentrate on the Eastern coast or the Western region of the United States (e.g. Giruad et al, 2005; Hardesty, 2008; Thilmanny et al, 2008) or would benefit from updated analyses (Eastwood et al, 1987). There are 12,549 community supported agriculture programs in the US, of which 4,015 (32%) are located in the Southeastern region (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2007), an indication of consumer support for producer-sourced food and food products. This paper aims to fill this gap in the literature by evaluating the characteristics of Southeastern urban consumers who purchased food directly from producers. The results of our study are based on an online survey of 1,023 primary household food shoppers who reside in five major cities in the southeast US (Atlanta GA, Nashville TN, Birmingham AL, and Houston and Austin TX). Novel study findings include the impact of disease incidences among respondent and related family members, a more accurate respondent understanding of the agriculture industry, and higher physical activity levels, all of which are significantly linked to increased likelihood to purchase direct from producers. Significant differences in respondent purchasing behavior were exhibited between cities, as well as relatively higher levels of respondent concern about the safety of U.S. grown food and food products. Female respondents with some college education who prepare more meals at home each week were statistically more likely to have purchased direct-from-producers within the previous six months (January through June, 2012), findings that are consistent with the existing literature. The results of this study are expected to assist growers located in the Southeast who are interested in securing and nurturing sustainable, producer-to-consumer relationships. Extension specialists can share survey findings by delivering producer educational programs built on informed, targeted marketing strategies that effectively meet the needs of the locally grown consumer base.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/142929
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Southern Agricultural Economics Association in its series 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida with number 142929.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 2013
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ags:saea13:142929

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.saea.org/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: Locally grown; Southeast; direct marketing; logit; consumer survey research; healthy eating habits; disease; Agribusiness; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Shermain D. Hardesty, 2008. "The Growing Role of Local Food Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(5), pages 1289-1295.
  2. Eastwood, David B. & Brooker, John R. & Orr, Robert H., 1987. "Consumer Preferences For Local Versus Out-Of-State Grown Selected Fresh Produce: The Case Of Knoxville, Tennessee," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(02), December.
  3. Dawn Thilmany & Craig A. Bond & Jennifer K. Bond, 2008. "Going Local: Exploring Consumer Behavior and Motivations for Direct Food Purchases," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(5), pages 1303-1309.
  4. Zepeda, Lydia & Leviten-Reid, Catherine, 2004. "Consumers' Views on Local Food," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 35(03), November.
  5. Bond, Jennifer Keeling & Thilmany, Dawn D. & Bond, Craig A., 2009. "What Influences Consumer Choice of Fresh Produce Purchase Location?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(01), April.
  6. Zepeda, Lydia & Li, Jinghan, 2006. "Who Buys Local Food?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 37(03), November.
  7. Giraud, Kelly L. & Bond, Craig A. & Bond, Jennifer Keeling, 2005. "Consumer Preferences for Locally Made Specialty Food Products Across Northern New England," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 34(2), October.
  8. Wolf, Marianne McGarry & Spittler, Arianne & Ahern, James, 2005. "A Profile of Farmers' Market Consumers and the Perceived Advantages of Produce Sold at Farmers' Markets," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 36(01), March.
  9. Nesve A. Turan Brewster & Peter D. Goldsmith, 2007. "Legal systems, institutional environment, and food safety," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 36(1), pages 23-38, 01.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Lange, Kelly, 2013. "Discussion: Challenges of Entering and Succeeding in Southeastern Agriculture: Access to Credit, Supply Chains, and Consumers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(03), August.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea13:142929. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.