IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saea10/56430.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of ranked ordered data when there are complete and partial ranking

Author

Listed:
  • Pandit, Mahesh
  • Paudel, Krishna P.
  • Dunn, Michael A.

Abstract

Many methods are available to analyze rank ordered data. We used a spectral density analysis to identify most preferred options of Formosan Subterranean Termites (FST) control as ranked by Louisiana homeowners. Respondents are asked to rank four termite control methods form the most preferred option to the least preferred option. Spectral analysis of both complete and partial ranked data indicates that the most preferred termite control choice is a relatively cheap ($0.13 per square foot) option of a Liquid treatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Pandit, Mahesh & Paudel, Krishna P. & Dunn, Michael A., 2010. "Analysis of ranked ordered data when there are complete and partial ranking," 2010 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2010, Orlando, Florida 56430, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:saea10:56430
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.56430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/56430/files/Partial_final_%20Ranking%20%20SAEA%20FINAL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.56430?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saea10:56430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.