Retailer-Wholesaler Response to State-Sponsored Marketing Programs: The Case of Jersey Fresh
AbstractJersey Fresh retailers and wholesalers feel that the logos are effective in increasing sales. Most feel that the popularity of the logo among the consumers is moderate. The results of this study indicate that the promotional aspect of the program was more popular among all the participant groups than the quality control aspect. The mail surveys indicated that a greater number of participants were aware of and were using the promotional logo than the quality grading logo. Only a fifth of the wholesalers who were aware of the quality-grading program were enrolled in the program. The results also indicated that participants who thought that consumer awareness of the program was high were more likely to be enrolled. This study also illustrates that most retailers and wholesalers participating in the program prefer the colorful Jersey Fresh Promotional Logo (Logo A in Appendix) and would like to have one common logo for both promotion and quality grading. Retailers who believed that consumers were highly aware of Jersey Fresh were found more likely to have been using the Jersey Fresh Logos. Retailers who used other logos to identify their fresh produce were found more likely to use Jersey Fresh Logos in the future. Willingness to use Jersey Fresh Logos in the future was found to be lower among retailers who sell more than 75 percent of their sales in retailing. Willingness to use the logos was also found to decrease with the age of retailers. Retailers with outlets in the urban areas of New Jersey and with retail outlets that were open for more than 8 months during the year were more likely to be use Jersey Fresh Logos. Farmers with more experience in retailing produce were more likely to use the logos. Wholesalers who used other logos, who advertised through signs and used word of mouth to identify their produce were more found more likely to use the Jersey Fresh Logos. Wholesalers who sell more than 75 percent of their annual trade to other wholesale buyers, were found less likely to use the logos and less willing to use the logos in the future.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics in its series P Series with number 36732.
Date of creation: 1998
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Cook Office Building, 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, N.J. 08901
Phone: (732) 932-9155
Fax: (732) 932-1100
Web page: http://www.dafre.rutgers.edu/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Peter Kennedy, 2003. "A Guide to Econometrics, 5th Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 5, volume 1, number 026261183x, June.
- Lopez, Rigoberto A. & Pagoulatos, Emilio & Polopolus, Leo C., 1989. "Constraints And Opportunities In Vegetable Trade," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 20(2), September.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.