IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nzar04/97774.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Benefit Transfer: Choice Experiment Results

Author

Listed:
  • Kerr, Geoffrey N.
  • Sharp, Basil M.H.

Abstract

Benefit transfer entails using estimates of non-market values derived at one site as approximations to benefits at other sites. The method finds favour because it can be applied quickly and cheaply, however the validity of benefit transfer is frequently questioned. Published studies generally indicate that errors from the approach can be extremely large and could result in significant resource misallocations. Assessing the validity of benefit transfer is complicated by differences in the nature of study and policy sites, the changes being valued, valuation methods, time of study, availability of substitutes and complements, and demographic, social and cultural differences. A choice experiment was used to evaluate the transferability of benefit estimates for identical goods between two different populations. The study design allowed most of the confounding factors to be controlled, so provides a strong test of benefit transfer validity. Several different tests were applied to evaluate benefit transfer validity, with conflicting results. The paper investigates the merits of the alternative tests and concludes that utility functions were different for the two populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerr, Geoffrey N. & Sharp, Basil M.H., 2004. "Benefit Transfer: Choice Experiment Results," 2004 Conference, June 25-26, 2004, Blenheim, New Zealand 97774, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nzar04:97774
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.97774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/97774/files/2004-2-benefit%20transfer_choice%20experiment%20results.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.97774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nzar04:97774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nzareea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.