IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr09/207483.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimization Model for Global Container Supply Chain: Imports to United States

Author

Listed:
  • Fan, Lei
  • Wilson, William W.
  • Tolliver, Denver

Abstract

The Transpacific trade in container between Northeast Asia and North America is one of the world’s highest volume arterial trade lanes. In comparison with Transpacific trade route, the Transatlantic trade route between Europe and North America is small and has been growing slow. Import container movement in these international trade lanes are the primary sources of United States container import activity. Container movements are heavily concentrated at a number of major gateways. The high concentration affects traffic and congestion at seaport as well as associated major transportation corridors. Concerns over potential long term congestion and large-ship draft restrictions have led shippers to seek alternatives. The all water routing through the Panama Canal to the East Coast is expected to grow to avoid potential congestion at West Coast. Canadian container ports are being developed and provide congestion free service and an interesting option for importers to reach U.S. markets. This paper analyzes the supply chain network with primary focus on import container to United States. An optimization model that integrates international trade and U.S. inland transport networks is developed. The supply chain channels include container import from Northeast Asia through the West Coast to U.S. inland markets of U.S. (defined by Business Economic Area), to East Coast of United States. via the Panama Canal, and European imports to U.S. markets through Gulf and East Coast. This study accounts for container imports to U.S. markets through existing and newly opened container ports in Canada. The model includes capacity restrictions at ports as well as capacities on the inland transport networks. The estimated container traffic flows are reflective of current traffic flows. Heavily concentrated corridors are indentified. Sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate impacts of congestion on capacity constraints. The optimization model presents a framework for capturing impacts on the supply chain network due to underlying cost structure changes and potential infrastructure constraints.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan, Lei & Wilson, William W. & Tolliver, Denver, 2009. "Optimization Model for Global Container Supply Chain: Imports to United States," 50th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Portland, Oregon, March 16-18, 2009 207483, Transportation Research Forum.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr09:207483
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207483/files/2009_11_OptModel_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leachman, Robert C., 2008. "Port and modal allocation of waterborne containerized imports from Asia to the United States," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 313-331, March.
    2. Shintani, Koichi & Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2007. "The container shipping network design problem with empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 39-59, January.
    3. Simme J Veldman & Ewout H Bückmann, 2003. "A Model on Container Port Competition: An Application for the West European Container Hub-Ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(1), pages 3-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Lei & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce, 2015. "Risk analysis in port competition for containerized imports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 743-753.
    2. Thi Yen Pham & Ki Young Kim & Gi-Tae YEO, 2018. "The Panama Canal Expansion and Its Impact on East–West Liner Shipping Route Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Guericke, Stefan & Tierney, Kevin, 2015. "Liner shipping cargo allocation with service levels and speed optimization," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 40-60.
    4. José Ignacio Castillo Manzano & Fernando González Laxe & Lourdes López Valpuesta, 2006. "Una Introducción al Análisis del Tráfico de Contenedores mediante los Vectores Autoregresivos," Economic Analysis Working Papers (2002-2010). Atlantic Review of Economics (2011-2016), Colexio de Economistas de A Coruña, Spain and Fundación Una Galicia Moderna, vol. 5, pages 1-23, January.
    5. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 0. "Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    6. Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang & Liu, Zhiyuan, 2013. "Bunker consumption optimization methods in shipping: A critical review and extensions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 49-62.
    7. Twrdy, Elen & Batista, Milan, 2016. "Modeling of container throughput in Northern Adriatic ports over the period 1990–2013," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 131-142.
    8. van Asperen, E. & Dekker, R., 2010. "Flexibility in Port Selection: A Quantitative Approach Using Floating Stocks," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Zheng, Jianfeng & Sun, Zhuo & Zhang, Fangjun, 2016. "Measuring the perceived container leasing prices in liner shipping network design with empty container repositioning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 123-140.
    10. Zhu, Shengda & Fu, Xiaowen & Bell, Michael G.H., 2021. "Container shipping line port choice patterns in East Asia the effects of port affiliation and spatial dependence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Wang, Hua & Wang, Shuaian & Meng, Qiang, 2014. "Simultaneous optimization of schedule coordination and cargo allocation for liner container shipping networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 261-273.
    12. DongJoon Lee & Seonyoung Lim & Kangsik Choi, 2017. "Port privatization under Cournot vs. Bertrand competition: a third-market approach," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 761-778, August.
    13. Zhao, Yiran & Yang, Zhongzhen & Haralambides, Hercules, 2019. "Optimizing the transport of export containers along China's coronary artery: The Yangtze River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 11-25.
    14. Alaa Abdelshafie & May Salah & Tomaž Kramberger & Dejan Dragan, 2022. "Repositioning and Optimal Re-Allocation of Empty Containers: A Review of Methods, Models, and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Yang, Dong & Pan, Kai & Wang, Shuaian, 2018. "On service network improvement for shipping lines under the one belt one road initiative of China," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 82-95.
    16. Leonard Heilig & Stefan Voß, 2017. "Information systems in seaports: a categorization and overview," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 179-201, September.
    17. Tobias Buer & Rasmus Haass, 2018. "Cooperative liner shipping network design by means of a combinatorial auction," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 686-711, December.
    18. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    19. Radmilović, Zoran & Zobenica, Radovan & Maraš, Vladislav, 2011. "River–sea shipping – competitiveness of various transport technologies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1509-1516.
    20. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr09:207483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.