IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddaae/40559.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 2006-2007

Author

Listed:
  • Swenson, Andrew L.

Abstract

The performance of over 500 North Dakota farms, 2006-2007, is summarized using 16 financial measures. Farms are categorized by geographic region, farm type, farm size, gross cash sales, farm tenure, net farm income, debt-to-asset, and age of farmer to analyze relationships between financial performance and farm characteristics. Five-year averages, 2002-2006, and farm financial trends for the 1998-2007 period are also presented. In 2007, median and average acreage per farm was 2,000 and 2,478, respectively. Median and average cash farm revenue was $353,252 and $458,843, respectively. Over 70% of farms were crop farms and nearly one-third of farms had gross sales exceeding $500,000. Median age of farm operators was 47. Every financial measure for 2007 was much superior to in any other year for the 1998-2007 period. The highest median net farm income was $127,791 in 2007, followed by $49,181 in 2003. The lowest was $19,491 in 1998. The Red River Valley and crop farms typically had stronger profitability, solvency, and repayment capacity from 1998 to 2007 than other regions and farm types, respectively. Exceptions were 2007 when the central regions had the best regional performance and 2005 when the south central region and livestock farms had better performance. The 2007 and 2006 median net farm income for crop farms was $171,838 and $53,642, respectively, compared to only $25,531and $6,150 for livestock farms. Farms with sales less than $100,000 were over twice as likely to have debt-to-asset higher than 70 percent than were farms with sales greater than $500,000. Farms that own some crop land, but less than 40 percent were more likely to be crop farms, farm more acreage, have larger sales, and be more profitable. As expected, solvency and percent of crop land owned increased with farmer age. In 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004 and 2007 the rate of return on equity exceeded the rate of return on assets, which indicates that debt capital was employed profitably. Interest expense as a percent of gross revenue declined in 2007 because of a sharp increase in gross revenue, after increasing in 2005 and 2006 because of higher debt and interest rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Swenson, Andrew L., 2008. "Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 2006-2007," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 40559, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:40559
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.40559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/40559/files/AAE633.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.40559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Swenson, Andrew L., 2010. "Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 2000-2009," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 96655, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    2. Swenson, Andrew L., 2009. "Financial Characteristics of North Dakota Farms 2007-2008," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 60366, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:40559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.