IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ncrsix/19005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is Storage at a Loss Merely an Illusion of Aggregation?

Author

Listed:
  • Franken, Jason R.V.
  • Garcia, Philip
  • Irwin, Scott H.

Abstract

The storage at a loss paradox of positive inventories despite inadequate spot-futures price spread coverage of storage costs is an unresolved issue of long-standing interest to economists. Alternative explanations include risk premiums for futures market speculators, convenience yields from having inventories on hand, and the mismeasurement/aggregation of data. T-test analyses of disaggregated data suggest soybean price behavior consistent with intertemporal arbitrage conditions and corn price behavior that may imply convenience yields.

Suggested Citation

  • Franken, Jason R.V. & Garcia, Philip & Irwin, Scott H., 2006. "Is Storage at a Loss Merely an Illusion of Aggregation?," 2006 Conference, April 17-18, 2006, St. Louis, Missouri 19005, NCR-134 Conference on Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ncrsix:19005
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.19005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/19005/files/cp06fr01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.19005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ncrsix:19005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dauiuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.