This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Zambia'S Stop-And-Go Revolution: The Impact Of Policies And Organizations On The Development And Spread Of Maize Technology

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Howard, Julie A.
Mungoma, Catherine
Abstract

1. INTRODUCTION Zambia's agricultural sector is indisputably dominated by maize. Maize is planted on 70 percent of total crop area, and is the main staple for its population of nine million, in both urban and rural areas. Zambians consume more than 170 kilograms of maize per person annually, one of the highest consumption rates in Africa (FAO 1994). For the past 20 years, Zambia has provided a unique laboratory for examining the impact of institutions and organizations on the development and dissemination of maize technology. Zambian maize production increased nearly fourfold from the early sixties to the late eighties because of a combination of surplus land,1 new varieties better suited to smallholder conditions,favorable input prices, the physical availability of input and product marketing outlets, and good weather (Figure 1). Increased maize production accelerated the agricultural growth rate to 3.4 percent annually during the 1980s, among the highest rates in sub-Saharan Africa. Government expenditures in support of maize were unsustainable, however, consuming seventeen percent of the total government budget by the late 1980s. Since the late 1980s, the implementation of structural adjustment programs, which liberalized marketing and financial services formerly dominated by the government, has contributed to a decline in maize area and production. This chapter explores how Zambia's policy and organizational environment has shaped the development, spread, and more recently, the disadoption of maize technology. It also traces the political motivations that drove the establishment of the policy and organizational framework supporting maize production and impeded the efficient operation of the parastatal-managed marketing system. Options facing Zambian policy makers for increasing food production under evolving political and economic conditions are discussed in the light of these experiences. 1 Only 15% of Zambia's arable land is cultivated.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/11299
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics in its series Food Security III Papers with number 11299.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 1996
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ags:midafs:11299

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 202 Agriculture Hall, East Lansing MI 48824-1039
Phone: (517) 355-4563
Fax: (517) 432-1800
Email:
Web page: http://www.aec.msu.edu/agecon/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (AgEcon Search).

Related research
Keywords: Crop Production/Industries;

Other versions of this item:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Weber, Michael T. & Pease, James & Vincent, Warren & Crawford, Eric W. & Stilwell, Thomas, 1983. "Microcomputers and Programmable Calculators for Agricultural Research in Developing Countries," Food Security III Papers 11308, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Kelly, Valerie & Stevens, Robert D. & Stilwell, Thomas & Weber, Michael T., 1983. "An Annotated Directory of Statistical and Related Microcomputer Software for Socioeconomic Data Analysis," Food Security III Papers 11420, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Valerie Kelly & Bocar Diagana & Thomas Reardon & Matar Gaye & Eric Crawford, 1996. "Cash Crop and Foodgrain Productivity in Senegal: Historical View, New Survey Evidence, and Policy Implications," International Development Papers 20, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Jayne, T.S., 1993. "Sources And Effects Of Instability In The World Rice Market," Food Security III Papers 11288, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics. [Downloadable!]
  5. Boughton, Duncan & de Frahan, Bruno Henry, 1994. "Agricultural Research Impact Assessment; The Case Of Maize Technology Adoption In Southern Mali," Food Security III Papers 11428, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Bates, Robert H & Collier, Paul, 1995. "The Politics and Economics of Policy Reform in Zambia," Journal of African Economies, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 115-43, May.
  7. Smale, Melinda, 1995. ""Maize is life": Malawi's delayed Green Revolution," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 819-831, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Steve Haggblade & Carl Liedholm & Donald C. Mead, 1986. "The Effect of Policy and Policy Reforms on Non-Agricultural Enterprises and Employment in Developing Countries: A Review of Past Experiences," International Development Working Papers 27, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Full references

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Jones Govereh & J.J. Shawa & E. Malawo & T.S. Jayne, 2006. "Raising the Productivity of Public Investments in Zambia’s Agricultural Sector," International Development Collaborative Working Papers ZM-FSRP-WP-20, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University. [Downloadable!]
  2. Maureen Chitundu & Klaus Droppelmann & Steven Haggblade, 2006. "A Value Chain Task Force Approach for Managing Private-Public Partnerships: Zamiba’s Task Force on Acceleration of Cassava Utilization," International Development Collaborative Working Papers ZM-FSRP-WP-21, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University. [Downloadable!]
  3. Barratt, N. & Chitundu, D. & Dover, O. & Elsinga, J. & Eriksson, S. & Guma, L. & Haggblade, M. & Haggblade, S. & Henn, T.O. & Locke, F.R. & O'Donnell, C. & Smith, C. & Stevens, T., 2006. "Cassava as drought insurance: Food security implications of cassava trials in Central Zambia," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 45(1), March. [Downloadable!]
  4. Smale, Melinda & Jayne, T.S., 2003. "Maize in Eastern and Southern Africa: 'seeds' of success in retrospect," EPTD discussion papers 97, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? The RePEc project started in 1997. Its precursor, NetEc, dates back to 1993.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-11.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.