IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma03/24320.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Toward Better Outcomes for Natural Resource Management Decisions - The Potential of Public Deliberation

Author

Listed:
  • Hodge, Sandra
  • Southorn, Neil

Abstract

The type of public participation or community consultation process used by communities to resolve natural resource management issues will have a major impact on the types of decisions which result. A familiar process is the "expert" model where expertise is delivered to the community rather than reflecting a true collaborative learning process with community members. An alternative is deliberation, a community-based process where community members engage incollaborative learning and find courses of action valuable to the community as a whole, and not those which represent just a few interests. This paper discusses two case studies - the development of Water Sharing Plans by River Management Committees in New South Wales, Australia, and concern over potential intensive livestock operations in Saline County, Missouri, USA - and compares how the different processes were used to resolve natural resource management issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Hodge, Sandra & Southorn, Neil, 2003. "Toward Better Outcomes for Natural Resource Management Decisions - The Potential of Public Deliberation," 14th Congress, Perth, Western Australia, August 10-15, 2003 24320, International Farm Management Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma03:24320
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.24320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24320/files/cp03ho01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.24320?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma03:24320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.