IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iefi09/59207.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Towards the Development of Innovative Strategies for Traditional Food Chains in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Molnar, Adrienn
  • Gellynck, Xavier
  • Vanhonacker, Filiep
  • Verbeke, Wim

Abstract

Traditional food products (TFPs) represent an important part of each European Member State’s cultural heritage and provide critical economic inputs to many regions via their production and sale. Nevertheless, a major challenge for the traditional food sector is to improve its competitiveness by applying innovations while at the same time maintaining traditionalism. Therefore, modernization of all aspects of the traditional food sector is necessary with special emphasis on the integrity of chains (EC, 2007). This illustrates a need for a chain strategy for the traditional food sector in the EU. Despite this recognition, the actual development of such chain strategies lags behind because of some particular issues which still needs to be addressed (e.g. vision, mission, values or action plans). This paper focuses on three key bottlenecks in relation to the development of a chain vision for the European traditional food sector, namely 1) integrating chain members’ goals, 2) selecting a minimum set of key goals and 3) balancing between rational and intuitive thinking. We refer to a chain as a set of three directly connected organizations (supplier, focal company, customer) being involved in the upstream and downstream flows of products, services, finances, information and/or knowledge adapted from Mentzer et al. (2001). The three directly connected organizations (supplier, focal company, customer) are referred as chain members in the rest of the article. A chain vision can be defined as the a statement of the desired future state of the chains being subject of chain vision development adapted from Raynor (1998).

Suggested Citation

  • Molnar, Adrienn & Gellynck, Xavier & Vanhonacker, Filiep & Verbeke, Wim, 2009. "Towards the Development of Innovative Strategies for Traditional Food Chains in the EU," 2009 International European Forum, February 15-20, 2009, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 59207, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iefi09:59207
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.59207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/59207/files/Molnar.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.59207?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerbens-Leenes, P. W. & Moll, H. C. & Schoot Uiterkamp, A. J. M., 2003. "Design and development of a measuring method for environmental sustainability in food production systems," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 231-248, September.
    2. Al-Mudimigh, Abdullah S. & Zairi, Mohamed & Ahmed, Abdel Moneim M., 2004. "Extending the concept of supply chain:: The effective management of value chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 309-320, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Santucci, Fabio M. & Callieris, Roberta & Debs, Philippe, 2012. "International Fairs in the Modern Food Systems," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 2(4), pages 1-12, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maico Roris Severino & Moacir Godinho Filho, 2019. "POLCA system for supply chain management: simulation in the automotive industry," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 1271-1289, March.
    2. Sivadasan, Suja & Smart, Janet & Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa & Calinescu, Anisoara, 2013. "Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 253-262.
    3. Vilko, Jyri P.P. & Hallikas, Jukka M., 2012. "Risk assessment in multimodal supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 586-595.
    4. de Brito, Marisa P. & Carbone, Valentina & Blanquart, Corinne Meunier, 2008. "Towards a sustainable fashion retail supply chain in Europe: Organisation and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 534-553, August.
    5. Caridi, Maria & Crippa, Luca & Perego, Alessandro & Sianesi, Andrea & Tumino, Angela, 2010. "Do virtuality and complexity affect supply chain visibility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 372-383, October.
    6. Leat, Philip M.K. & Lamprinopoulou-Kranis, Chrysa & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar & Kupiec-Teahan, Beata, 2011. "Agri-food supply chains and sustainability-related issues: evidence from across the Scottish agri-food economy," Working Papers 109424, Scotland's Rural College (formerly Scottish Agricultural College), Land Economy & Environment Research Group.
    7. Katri Joensuu & Eric Harrison & Hanna Hartikainen, 2022. "What to Do with Food Waste? A Holistic Feasibility Framework to Evaluate Different Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    8. Tuni, Andrea & Rentizelas, Athanasios, 2019. "An innovative eco-intensity based method for assessing extended supply chain environmental sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 126-142.
    9. Moreno-Miranda, Carlos & Dries, Liesbeth, 2022. "Integrating coordination mechanisms in the sustainability assessment of agri-food chains: From a structured literature review to a comprehensive framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    10. Reiner, Gerald, 2005. "Customer-oriented improvement and evaluation of supply chain processes supported by simulation models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 381-395, June.
    11. Wood, Richard & Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher & Lundie, Sven, 2006. "A comparative study of some environmental impacts of conventional and organic farming in Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 324-348, September.
    12. Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid & Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Busso, Donatella & Yahiaoui, Dorra, 2022. "Towards agility in international high-tech SMEs: Exploring key drivers and main outcomes of dynamic capabilities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Wurtenberger, Laura & Koellner, Thomas & Binder, Claudia R., 2006. "Virtual land use and agricultural trade: Estimating environmental and socio-economic impacts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 679-697, June.
    14. Naoum Tsolakis & Foivos Anastasiadis & Jagjit Singh Srai, 2018. "Sustainability Performance in Food Supply Networks: Insights from the UK Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    15. Bulim Choi & Kang-Dae Lee, 2019. "Packaging as an Offline Method to Share Information: Evidence from the Food and Beverage Industry in the Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-13, November.
    16. Teller, Christoph & Kotzab, Herbert & Grant, David B., 2012. "Improving the execution of supply chain management in organizations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 713-720.
    17. Lehmann, Richard J. & Fritz, Melanie & Schiefer, Gerhard, 2011. "Information Reference Models for European Pork Supply Networks," 2011 International European Forum, February 14-18, 2011, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 122014, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    18. Mamouni Limnios, Elena & Schilizzi, Steven G.M. & Burton, Michael & Ong, Angeline & Hynes, Niki, 2016. "Willingness to pay for product ecological footprint: Organic vs non-organic consumers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 338-348.
    19. Vlaeminck, Pieter & Jiang, Ting & Vranken, Liesbet, 2014. "Food labeling and eco-friendly consumption: Experimental evidence from a Belgian supermarket," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 180-190.
    20. Lichy, Jessica & Dutot, Vincent & Kachour, Maher, 2022. "When technology leads social business: Food truck innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy; Farm Management; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi09:59207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.