IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iefi07/6613.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Industry Networks and Sustainable Competitive Advantages in Brazilian and U.S. Processed Citrus Supply Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Sterns, James A.
  • Spreen, Thomas H.

Abstract

The states of Sao Paulo, Brazil and Florida, United States collectively dominate the world supply of orange juice. Collectively, these two regions account for over 80 percent of world processed orange production (Spreen, et al). Florida is the prime supplier to the United States and Canada, while Sao Paulo dominates world trade of orange juice and is the primary supplier to the EU market. It is these three markets - the United States, Canada and the EU - that represent the vast majority of global consumption of processed orange products (Spreen). The global dominance by these two national industries is being threatened. Both the Florida and Sao Paulo citrus industries are experiencing outbreaks of the same potentially devastating diseases - citrus canker (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri) and citrus greening (Liberibacter asiaticus). Citrus canker forms lesions on fruit, causing premature fruit drop and rendering the fruit unsuitable for fresh market sales. "In addition to lowering yields, there is likely some increase in tree mortality as canker may open pathways for other diseases ... [though] tree mortality is not the major concern with endemic citrus canker (Spreen, et al., p. 14-5)." On the other hand, citrus greening, as observed in Asia, has had devastating effects on citrus production, leading to very high rates of tree mortality. As greening is quite new to both Sao Paulo and Florida, the actual magnitude of this threat is still unknown, but most industry observers are openly concerned about the potential for significant losses of citrus trees.

Suggested Citation

  • Sterns, James A. & Spreen, Thomas H., 2007. "Industry Networks and Sustainable Competitive Advantages in Brazilian and U.S. Processed Citrus Supply Chains," 2007 1st Forum, February 15-17, 2007, Innsbruck, Austria 6613, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iefi07:6613
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.6613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/6613/files/sp08st01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.6613?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Serra, Virginia & Woodford, Keith & Martin, Sandra, 2005. "Sources of Competitive Advantage in the Uruguayan and New Zealand Beef Industries," 15th Congress, Campinas SP, Brazil, August 14-19, 2005 24292, International Farm Management Association.
    2. Howard Davies & Paul Ellis, 2000. "Porter’s Competitive Advantage Of Nations: Time For The Final Judgement?," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1189-1214, December.
    3. Esterhuizen, Dirk & van Rooyen, C.J. & D'Haese, Luc, 2001. "Determinants Of Competitiveness In The South African Agro-Food And Fibre Complex," Working Papers 18047, University of Pretoria, Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sterns, James A. & Spreen, Thomas H., 2010. "Evaluating Sustainable Competitive Advantages in Brazilian and U.S. Processed Citrus Supply Chains: An Application of Porter’s Diamond Framework," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(2), pages 1-9.
    2. Aki Tomizawa & Li Zhao & Geneviève Bassellier & David Ahlstrom, 2020. "Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the Great Enrichment," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 7-31, March.
    3. David Ahlstrom & Amber Y. Chang & Jessie S. T. Cheung, 2019. "Encouraging Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Gabriela Koľveková & Erika Liptáková & Ľubomír Štrba & Branislav Kršák & Csaba Sidor & Michal Cehlár & Samer Khouri & Marcel Behún, 2019. "Regional Tourism Clustering Based on the Three Ps of the Sustainability Services Marketing Matrix: An Example of Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Maryam Khosravi & Mahmood Yahyazadehfar & Mohsen Alizadeh Sani, 2023. "Economic growth and human capital in Iran: A phenomenological study in a major Central Asian economy," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 645-679, June.
    6. Haoqiang Li & Jihong Chen & Zheng Wan & Huaxin Zhang & Maoxin Wang & Yun Bai, 2020. "Spatial evaluation of knowledge spillover benefits in China’s free trade zone provinces and cities," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1158-1181, September.
    7. Angelos Kotios & Spyros Roukanas & Emmanouil Karakostas, 2019. "Protectionism or Strengthening Competitiveness: The Case of the United States of America," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 69(3), pages 21-34, July-Sept.
    8. Al-Dailami, Mohammed Abdullah & Masih, Mansur, 2017. "Is interest rate still the right tool for stimulating economic growth ? evidence from Japan," MPRA Paper 86387, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Andrzej Parzonko & Tomasz Rokicki & Lisa Holden, 2022. "Changes in the comparative advantage of Polish dairy products," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(12), pages 464-475.
    10. Azzopardi, Ernest & Nash, Robert, 2013. "A critical evaluation of importance–performance analysis," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 222-233.
    11. Corinna Doegl, & Dirk Holtbruegge, 2010. "Competitive advantage of German renewable energy firms in Russsia – An empirical study based on Porter’s diamond," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 34-58.
    12. Fraser, Gavin C.G., 2010. "How the leopard has changed its spots: past dynamics and future opportunities," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 49(1), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Federico G. Topolansky Barbe & Carol Yongmei Zhang & Magdalena M. Gonzalez Triay & Clemence Mzendah, 2016. "Does the Conventional Paradigm help to Analyze the Competitiveness of an Industry?," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(9), pages 68-84, September.
    14. Garud, Raghu & Gehman, Joel & Giuliani, Antonio Paco, 2014. "Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1177-1188.
    15. Md Kamal Hossain, 2020. "Competitiveness of Bangladeshi Ready Made Garments Industry in global Market," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 4(6), pages 1-18.
    16. Xiaodong Sun & Tsz Leung Yip & Yui-yip Lau, 2019. "Location Characteristics of Cruise Terminals in China: A Lesson from Hong Kong and Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    17. Bachev, Hrabrin & Koteva, Nina & Ivanov, Bojidar & Mitova, Dilyana & Boevski, Ivan & Terziev, Dimitar & Dimova, Nadejda & Dimitrova, Reneta & Marinov, Petar & Zvyatkova, Daniela & Sarov, Angel & Koste, 2021. "Холистичен Подход За Дефиниране, Оценяване И Подобряване На Конкурентоспособността На Земеделските Стопанства В България [A holistic framework for defining, evaluating, and improving the competitiv," MPRA Paper 111498, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi07:6613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.