IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iatrcp/14622.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Domestic Support: Issues And Options In The Agricultural Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Kennedy, P. Lynn
  • Brink, Lars
  • Dyck, John H.
  • MacLaren, Donald

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kennedy, P. Lynn & Brink, Lars & Dyck, John H. & MacLaren, Donald, 2001. "Domestic Support: Issues And Options In The Agricultural Negotiations," Commissioned Papers 14622, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iatrcp:14622
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.14622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/14622/files/cp16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.14622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P. Lynn Kennedy & Won W. Koo & Mary A. Marchant, 1999. "Key Issues and Challenges for the 1999 World Trade Organization Agriculture Round," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(5), pages 1134-1141.
    2. Nelson, Frederick J. & Schertz, Lyle P., 1996. "Provisions of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996," Agricultural Information Bulletins 262104, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Marchant, Mary A., 1999. "Hopes And Fears: The New World Trade Negotiations And Southern Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-16, August.
    4. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada., 2000. "Domestic Support Issues in the Uruguay Round and Beyond," Papers 4-2000, Gouvernement du Canada - Agriculture Canada.
    5. repec:ags:joaaec:v:31:y:1999:i:2:p:185-200 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James Rude & Karl D. Meilke, 2002. "Two Unknowns and No Equations: Implications of the Doha Declaration for Canadian Agricultural Policy," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 50(4), pages 415-437, December.
    2. Jay Fabiosa & John Beghin & Amani Elobeid & Holger Matthey & Alexander Saak & Stéphane de Cara & Cheng Fang & Murat Isik & Pat Westhoff & D. Scott Brown & Brian Willott & Daniel Madison & Seth Meyer &, 2005. "The Doha Round of the World Trade Organization and Agricultural Markets Liberalization: Impacts on Developing Economies," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 27(3), pages 317-335.
    3. John C. Beghin & David Roland-Holst & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2002. "Global Agricultural Trade and the Doha Round: What are the Implications for North and South?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 02-wp308, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Beghin, John C. & de Cara, Stephane & Fang, Cheng & Isik, Murat & Matthey, Holger, 2003. "Agricultural Markets Liberalization And The Doha Round," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25875, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Devadoss, Stephen, 2002. "Domestic Support And Wto Negotiations From Developing Countries' Perspectives," 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California 36667, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Zhao, Jing & Miller, J. Isaac & Binfield, Julian & Thompson, Wyatt, 2022. "Modeling and Forecasting Agricultural Commodity Support in the Developing Countries," Commissioned Papers 321785, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    7. McCalla, Alex F., 2003. "Liberalizing Agricultural Trade: Will It Ever Be a Reality?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Bruce A. Babcock & John C. Beghin & Jacinto F. Fabiosa & Stephane De Cara & Amani Elobeid & Cheng Fang & Chad E. Hart & Murat Isik & Holger Matthey & Alexander E. Saak & Karen Kovarik & FAPRI Staff, 2002. "Doha Round of the World Trade Organization: Appraising Further Liberalization of Agricultural Markets, The," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 02-wp317, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lohano, Heman Das, 2002. "A Stochastic Dynamic Programming Analysis of Farmland Investment and Financial Management," Faculty and Alumni Dissertations 309035, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    2. Harrison, R. Wes, 2013. "The RESTORE Act of 2012: Implications for the Gulf Coast," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45, pages 1-7, August.
    3. Nancy H. Chau & Harry de Gorter, 2005. "Disentangling the Consequences of Direct Payment Schemes in Agriculture on Fixed Costs, Exit Decisions, and Output," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(5), pages 1174-1181.
    4. Zulauf, Carl R. & Orden, David, 2009. "ACRE in the U.S. Farm Bill and the WTO," Working Papers 51821, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    5. Glebe, Thilo & Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe, 2007. "Agricultural multifunctionality and trade liberalisation," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 82.
    6. Spyros Niavis & George Vlontzos, 2019. "Seeking for Convergence in the Agricultural Sector Performance under the Changes of Uruguay Round and 1992 CAP Reform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Padgitt, Merritt & Newton, Doris & Penn, Renata & Sandretto, Carmen, 2000. "Production Practices for Major Crops in U.S. Agriculture, 1990-97," Statistical Bulletin 262287, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    8. Smith, Rachel K. & Duffy, Patricia A. & Novak, James L. & Wilson, Norbert L.W., 2009. "Supply Response of Crops in the Southeast," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46756, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    9. Marchant, Mary A., 1999. "Hopes and Fears: The New World Trade Negotiations and Southern Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 185-200, August.
    10. Smith, Vincent H. & Glauber, Joseph W., 1997. "The Effects Of The 1996 Farm Bill On Food And Feed Grains," Policy Issues Papers 29170, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Trade Research Center.
    11. Hueth, Brent, 1998. "Target Prices, Payment Limits And Non-Market Concerns In The Design Of U.S. Agricultural Policy," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20992, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Carl R. Zulauf & Scott H. Irwin, 1998. "Market Efficiency and Marketing to Enhance Income of Crop Producers," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 20(2), pages 308-331.
    13. Glebe, T., 2006. "Agricultural multifunctionality: a case against trade liberalisation?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 41, March.
    14. Thilo Glebe & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2007. "Agricultural multifunctionality and trade liberalisation," Post-Print hal-01201147, HAL.
    15. Thilo Glebe & Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, 2007. "Agricultural multifunctionality and trade liberalisation," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 82, pages 57-73.
    16. Dustin L Pendell & Thomas L Marsh & Keith H Coble & Jayson L Lusk & Sara C Szmania, 2015. "Economic Assessment of FMDv Releases from the National Bio and Agro Defense Facility," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-22, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iatrcp:14622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iatrcea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.