IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae09/50104.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Good News, Bad News: Results from a National Representative Panel Survey on China’s NCMS

Author

Listed:
  • Yi, Hongmei
  • Zhang, Linxiu
  • Singer, Kim
  • Rozelle, Scott
  • Atlas, Scott

Abstract

The overall goal of the paper is to understand the progress of the implementation of China’s New Cooperative Medical System (NCMS) program. In the paper we seek to assess the strengths and weaknesses of the program and understand its effect on rural residents using a panel of national-representative, household survey data that were collected in 2005 and early 2008. According to our data, we found that there have been substantial improvements to the NCMS in coverage and participation. The service received by rural residents also improved in 2007. While the progress of the NCMS program is clear, there are still weaknesses. Most importantly, the program clearly does not meet its goal of providing insurance against catastrophic illnesses. On average, individuals that required inpatient treatment in 2007 were reimbursed for 15 percent of their expenditures. Although this is higher than in 2004, on average, as the severity of the illness (in terms of expenditures on health care) rose, the rate of coverage fell. The reimbursement rate for illnesses that required expenditures between 5,000 and 10,000 yuan (over 10,000 yuan) was only 11 percent (8 percent). Our analysis shows that the limiting factor is constrained funding.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi, Hongmei & Zhang, Linxiu & Singer, Kim & Rozelle, Scott & Atlas, Scott, 2009. "Good News, Bad News: Results from a National Representative Panel Survey on China’s NCMS," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 50104, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:50104
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.50104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/50104/files/Ref_107.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.50104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:50104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.