IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/hcwpum/188474.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Potential global crop pest distributions using CLIMEX: HarvestChoice Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Beddow, Jason M.
  • Kriticos, Darren J.
  • Pardey, Philip G.
  • Sutherst, Robert W.

Abstract

Executive Summary: HarvestChoice provides data, information and tools to support strategic investment decisions in agriculture. Most agricultural processes are strongly influenced by biotic stressors, such as insects and pathogens. However, available pest information has been lacking, for example global maps of where pests and diseases could occur have not been available. To address this deficiency, HarvestChoice has developed and implemented an approach to pest modeling aimed directly at supporting strategic decisions in agriculture. The HarvestChoice system includes methods, techniques and tools to both collect primary data on pest occurrence and to model potential global pest occurrence. In addition, a global team of recognized pest and climate experts has been assembled to aid in modeling, validation and peer-review. The pest modeling system developed by HarvestChoice differs from the more typical monitoring and prediction systems that support short- to medium-term objectives, such as responding to pest events. Rather, we support strategic decision-making by mapping not where pests occur, but where they might potentially occur. This approach allows us to answer hypothetical questions that were previously unanswerable. For example, we can provide broad information on what portion of the world’s crop area could be subject to a pest or what might happen if a new variety were planted in a previously un-cropped location. The end results of our efforts are maps of potential pest occurrence. These maps are produced by modeling a species’ response to factors such as temperature and moisture, while carefully keeping certain other factors exogenous (namely, those factors that might be decision variables for strategic planning). For example, the models are not conditional on the actual presence of a susceptible host, so our maps show the potential pest distribution assuming that susceptible hosts occur everywhere, avoiding confounding the host climate responses with those of the pest. The models combine geo-spatial climate data and information on the seasonal phenology of each pest to investigate potential growth, stress and persistence of pests on a global scale. Growth is measured by a “Growth Index,” higher values of which indicate a higher potential for that the pest’s population to grow at a given location. Potential growth is restricted by sub-optimal temperatures or moisture and the pest’s survival is limited by stresses, such as extremely cold or dry conditions. A final index, the “Ecoclimatic Index,” is calculated by considering the extent to which growth is possible during the favorable season and survival is limited by the stresses during the non-growth season at each location. The result of this calculation, the Ecoclimatic Index is a measure of the potential ability of the pest to persist and develop high population sizes at a location: that is, whether it can survive the extremes of summer, winter, dry and wet seasons. This Working Paper describes the HarvestChoice approach to pest modeling and places that work in the context of other pest mapping efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Beddow, Jason M. & Kriticos, Darren J. & Pardey, Philip G. & Sutherst, Robert W., 2010. "Potential global crop pest distributions using CLIMEX: HarvestChoice Applications," Working Papers 188474, HarvestChoice.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:hcwpum:188474
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.188474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/188474/files/Beddow%20et%20al%202010%20HC%20--%20Potential%20Global%20Crop%20Pest%20Distributions%20Using%20CLIMEX_3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.188474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hurley, Terrance M., 2010. "A review of agricultural production risk in the developing world," Working Papers 188476, HarvestChoice.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chai, Yuan & Kriticos, Darren J. & Beddow, Jason M. & Ota, Noboru & Yonow, Tania & Cuddy, William S., 2016. "Puccinia triticina (Wheat Leaf Rust)," Pest Geography Briefs 249754, HarvestChoice.
    2. Castex, V. & García de Cortázar-Atauri, I. & Calanca, P. & Beniston, M. & Moreau, J., 2020. "Assembling and testing a generic phenological model to predict Lobesia botrana voltinism for impact studies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 420(C).
    3. Beddow, Jason M. & Sutherst, Robert W. & Kriticos, Darren J. & Duveiller, Etienne & Chai, Yuan, 2015. "Puccinia graminis (Wheat Stem Rust)," Pest Geography Briefs 249746, HarvestChoice.
    4. Chai, Yuan & Kriticos, Darren J. & Beddow, Jason M. & Duveiller, Etienne & Cuddy, William S. & Yonow, Tania & Sutherst, Robert W., 2015. "Puccinia striiformis (Wheat Stripe Rust)," Pest Geography Briefs 249753, HarvestChoice.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Terrance Hurley & Jawoo Koo & Kindie Tesfaye, 2018. "Weather risk: how does it change the yield benefits of nitrogen fertilizer and improved maize varieties in sub‐Saharan Africa?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 711-723, November.
    2. Mohan, Sarah, 2020. "Risk aversion and certification: Evidence from the Nepali tea fields," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    3. Nancy McCarthy & Talip Kilic & Alejandro de la Fuente & Joshua M. Brubaker, 2018. "Shelter from the Storm? Household-Level Impacts of, and Responses to, the 2015 Floods in Malawi," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 237-258, October.
    4. Auriol, Emmanuelle & Delissaint, Diego & Fourati, Maleke & Miquel-Florensa, Josepa & Seabright, Paul, 2021. "Betting on the lord: Lotteries and religiosity in Haiti," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. de Brauw, Alan & Eozenou, Patrick, 2014. "Measuring risk attitudes among Mozambican farmers," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 61-74.
    6. Julia Ihli, Hanna & Chiputwa, Brian & Winter, Etti & Gassner, Anja, 2022. "Risk and time preferences for participating in forest landscape restoration: The case of coffee farmers in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    7. Saul Ngarava & Abbyssinia Mushunje & Amon Taruvinga & Peter Mukarumbwa & Simbarashe Tatsvarei & Ebenezer T Megbowon, 2018. "Determinants of Risk Behaviour in Livestock Development Programs: Evidence from South Africa's Kaonafatso Yadikgomo (Kyd) Scheme," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(5), pages 7-15.
    8. Ihli, Hanna Julia & Chiputwa, Brian & Musshoff, Oliver, 2016. "Do Changing Probabilities or Payoffs in Lottery-Choice Experiments Affect Risk Preference Outcomes? Evidence from Rural Uganda," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(2), May.
    9. Bannor, Frank & Dikgang, Johane & Gelo, Dambala, 2021. "Agricultural total factor productivity growth, technical efficiency, and climate variability in sub-Saharan Africa," EconStor Preprints 231310, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    10. Liz Ignowski & Bart Minten, 2021. "Agricultural Transformation, Technology Adoption and Inclusion of Small Farmers: The Case of Dairy in East Africa," LICOS Discussion Papers 42621, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    11. Jimena Gonzalez-Ramirez & Poonam Arora & Guillermo Podesta, 2018. "Using Insights from Prospect Theory to Enhance Sustainable Decision Making by Agribusinesses in Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-15, August.
    12. McCarthy, Nancy & Brubaker, Josh & Mabiso, Athur & Cavatassi, Romina, 2022. "IFAD Research Series 87: Incorporating the Impact of Climate and Weather Variables in Impact Assessments - An Application to an IFAD Grain Storage Project Implemented in Chad," IFAD Research Series 329498, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    13. Patil, V. & Veettil, P.C., 2018. "Experimental Evidence of Risk Attitude of Farmers from Risk-Preference Elicitation in India," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277331, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. repec:mth:jas888:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:116-130 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Oscar J. Cacho & Jonathan Moss & Philip K. Thornton & Mario Herrero & Ben Henderson & Benjamin L. Bodirsky & Florian Humpenöder & Alexander Popp & Leslie Lipper, 2020. "The value of climate-resilient seeds for smallholder adaptation in sub-Saharan Africa," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1213-1229, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:hcwpum:188474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://harvestchoice.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.