IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae14/182842.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Identifying determinants of income inequality in the presence of multiple income sources: The case of Korean farm households

Author

Listed:
  • Kimhi, Ayal
  • Arayama, Yuko
  • Kim, Jong-Moo

Abstract

The issue of inequality received much attention in the economic literature in the last two decades, motivated by the recognition that inequality is not only an outcome of growth but also a determinant of growth. The increased availability of survey data has led to numerous empirical studies of inequality. A strand of this literature deals with the impact on inequality of the diversification of income sources by farm households. As farmers worldwide are gradually shifting to part-time off-farm work, it is an empirical question whether this raises or lowers income inequality among them. It could lower inequality if off-farm income compensates for low farm income, but it could raise inequality if the more qualified farmers earn more off the farm. For policy purposes, it is not sufficient to know whether off-farm income increases or decreases inequality, because we need to know the impact on inequality of various determinants of income, which are sensitive to policy measures. These include education, landholdings, etc. The purpose of this research is to offer an empirical framework for identifying determinants of income inequality in societies in which significant fractions of households have multiple income sources. This is relevant for many low- and middle-income countries, and in particular for agricultural societies. The usefulness of this framework will be demonstrated using data on farm households in Korea. Korean agriculture has experienced structural transformations similar to many other developed economies. In particular, rural-to-urban migration resulted in a massive loss of rural population, which declined from about a third in 1970 to less than 10% in 2000. Among farm households, about a third are engaged in off-farm labor activities, and the fraction of off-farm income is increasing. Farm size disparities are also increasing over the years. The level of income inequality among farm households is larger now than among all Korean households. In this paper, two major empirical methods are proposed to study the sources and determinants of income inequality among Korean farm households. The first is inequality decomposition by income sources, which provides evidence on the relative importance of various income sources to inequality, and allows the computation of the impact on inequality of a uniform increase in income from each source. It was found that farm business income, which accounts for 42% of total income, is responsible for 58% of total income inequality. On the other hand, off-farm labor income, which accounts for 20% of total income, is responsible for only 12% of inequality. This implies that off-farm labor income is an inequality-decreasing income source. In particular, marginal effect computations show that a one-percent uniform increase in off-farm income is expected to reduce the Gini coefficient by 0.033%. The second method is regression-based inequality decomposition, which allows the quantification of the contributions of various factors, which affect household income, to income inequality. In particular, a linear regression of income on these factors is estimated, and each factor multiplied by its estimated coefficient is treated as an “income source”, and then the method of inequality decomposition by income source can be applied. It was found that education and landholdings combined explain about a third of the explained part of income inequality. Moreover, a uniform one-percent increase in education is expected to reduce the Gini coefficient by 2.5%, while a uniform one-percent increase in landholdings is expected to reduce the Gini by 0.02%. These results provide a solid basis for policy implications. Another set of variables that was found to contribute to inequality is family size and composition. For example, a uniform one-percent increase in family size is expected to increase the Gini coefficient by more than 4%. We extend the above two decomposition techniques by breaking down the inequality contributions of the income determinants by income source. We do this by estimating a separate regression for each income source, corrected for selectivity, and then repeating the above analysis. It was found that family size and land ownership contribute to income inequality mostly through farm income, while education contributes mostly through non-farm labor income. The conclusion is that the process of farmland concentration and farm size polarization is likely to increase income inequality within the farm sector in Korea. However, at least part of this effect can be mitigated by extending education in the rural population in an equitable manner, so that those who lose due to the structural changes in the farm sector could benefit from the off-farm income opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Kimhi, Ayal & Arayama, Yuko & Kim, Jong-Moo, 2014. "Identifying determinants of income inequality in the presence of multiple income sources: The case of Korean farm households," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182842, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae14:182842
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.182842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/182842/files/Income_Inequality_among_Korean_Farm_Households_eaae_2014.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.182842?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayal Kimhi, 2010. "Entrepreneurship and income inequality in southern Ethiopia," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 81-91, January.
    2. Anthony F. Shorrocks, 1983. "The Impact of Income Components on the Distribution of Family Incomes," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 98(2), pages 311-326.
    3. Janvry, Alain de & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2001. "Income Strategies Among Rural Households in Mexico: The Role of Off-farm Activities," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 467-480, March.
    4. Arayama, Yuko & Kim, Jong Moo & Kimhi, Ayal, 2009. "Identifying Determinants of Income Inequality among Korean Farm Households," Discussion Papers 290006, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    5. Kimhi, Ayal, 2011. "Comment: On the Interpretation (and Misinterpretation) of Inequality Decompositions by Income Sources," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(10), pages 1888-1890.
    6. Lerman, Robert I & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 1985. "Income Inequality Effects by Income," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 67(1), pages 151-156, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daranrat Jaitiang & Wen-Chi Huang & Shang-Ho Yang, 2021. "Does Income Inequality Exist among Urban Farmers? A Demonstration of Lorenz Curves from Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Morduch & Terry Sicular, 2002. "Rethinking Inequality Decomposition, With Evidence from Rural China," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(476), pages 93-106, January.
    2. Babulo, Bedru & Muys, Bart & Nega, Fredu & Tollens, Eric & Nyssen, Jan & Deckers, Jozef & Mathijs, Erik, 2009. "The economic contribution of forest resource use to rural livelihoods in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 123-131, March.
    3. Arthur Charpentier & Stéphane Mussard, 2011. "Income inequality games," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 9(4), pages 529-554, December.
    4. Ayal Kimhi, 2010. "Entrepreneurship and income inequality in southern Ethiopia," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 81-91, January.
    5. Rausch, Sebastian & Metcalf, Gilbert E. & Reilly, John M., 2011. "Distributional impacts of carbon pricing: A general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(S1), pages 20-33.
    6. Tushar Agrawal & Ankush Agrawal, 2023. "Beyond Consumption Expenditure: Income Inequality and Its Sources in India," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 23(1), pages 7-27, January.
    7. Mary C. Daly & Robert G. Valletta, 2000. "Inequality and poverty in the United States: the effects of changing family behavior and rising wage dispersion," Working Paper Series 2000-06, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    8. Kimhi, Ayal, 2011. "Can Female Non-Farm Labor Income Reduce Income Inequality? Evidence from Rural Southern Ethiopia," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114756, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Fräßdorf, Anna & Grabka, Markus M. & Schwarze, Johannes, 2008. "The Impact of Household Capital Income on Income Inequality: A Factor Decomposition Analysis for Great Britain, Germany and the USA," IZA Discussion Papers 3492, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Ayal Kimhi, 2009. "Male Income, Female Income, and Household Income Inequality in Israel: A Decomposition Analysis," Journal of Income Distribution, Ad libros publications inc., vol. 18(3-4), pages 34-48, September.
    11. Yunbo Zhou, 2009. "The factors that impact income inequality of rural residents in China: Decomposing the Gini coefficient from income components," Frontiers of Economics in China, Springer;Higher Education Press, vol. 4(4), pages 617-632, December.
    12. Wen Hao Chen & Michael F rster & Ana Llena-Nozal, 2013. "Determinants of Household Earnings Inequality: The Role of Labour Market Trends and Changing Household Structure," LIS Working papers 591, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    13. Kimhi, Ayal, 2010. "International Remittances, Domestic Remittances, and Income Inequality in the Dominican Republic," Discussion Papers 93130, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    14. Peter Hoeller & Isabelle Joumard & Mauro Pisu & Debra Bloch, 2012. "Less Income Inequality and More Growth – Are They Compatible? Part 1. Mapping Income Inequality Across the OECD," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 924, OECD Publishing.
    15. Ashish Singh & Kaushalendra Kumar & Abhishek Singh, 2015. "The Changing Structure of Inequality in India, 1993-2010: Some Observations and Consequences," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(1), pages 590-603.
    16. Mishra, Ashok & El-Osta, Hisham & Gillespie, Jeffrey M., 2009. "Effect of agricultural policy on regional income inequality among farm households," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 325-340, May.
    17. Stéphane Mussard, 2006. "La décomposition des mesures d’inégalité en sources de revenu : l’indice de Gini et les généralisations," Cahiers de recherche 06-05, Departement d'économique de l'École de gestion à l'Université de Sherbrooke.
    18. Severini, Simone & Tantari, Antonella, 2014. "The contribution of different off-farm income sources and government payments to regional income inequality among farm households in Italy," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 3(2), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Ayal Kimhi & Moran Sandel, 2011. "Religious Schooling, Secular Schooling, and Household Income Inequality in Israel," Working Papers 29, AlmaLaurea Inter-University Consortium.
    20. Ayal Kimhi, 2010. "Jewish Households, Arab Households, And Income Inequality In Rural Israel: Ramifications For The Israeli-Arab Conflict," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 381-394.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae14:182842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.