IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae11/114361.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Linguistic False Friends and Expected Food Markets: What can Make Consumers Not Choose Your Product?

Author

Listed:
  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Philippe
  • Fauquet-Alekhine-Pavlovskaia, Elena

Abstract

Many researches have been done concerning the study of parameters which make people choose or not such product on the market. Concerning food industry, scientists have been involved in the analysis of technical parameters (nutrition, health characteristics) and their perception by the consumer, and in the analysis of psycho-sociological parameters linked with the perception of the product, or emotion associated with food or its environment. Other parameters investigated are suspicion of novelties, adherence to technology or to natural food, enjoyment, necessity. But what about the effect of words from the socio-psycholinguistic standpoint? It seems to be poorly investigated. Some claims: “It doesn’t matter how important the brand name is to the company, it’s what it means to the public that counts”. Concerning the foreign migration of brands (the use of a brand from one country to another), some psychological functions associated with language are weakened in the communication process. If an undesirable link is built between the concept of the brand and another one in the target foreign market, this can come from some communication channels detailed in this study. The weakened psychological functions can be some of the causes, and the undesirable link built through the communication channels is the consequence. It is shown why unexpected links between the brand (or the product name) and an undesirable concept must be looked for in six dimensions (academic, common, popular, rude language, slang, and “no meaning” language), and how an adapted advertisement campaign can enforced the psychological functions associated with language.

Suggested Citation

  • Fauquet-Alekhine, Philippe & Fauquet-Alekhine-Pavlovskaia, Elena, 2011. "Linguistic False Friends and Expected Food Markets: What can Make Consumers Not Choose Your Product?," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114361, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae11:114361
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.114361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/114361/files/Fauquet-Alekhine-Pavlovskaia_Elena_663.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.114361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kohli, Chiranjeev S. & Harich, Katrin R. & Leuthesser, Lance, 2005. "Creating brand identity: a study of evaluation of new brand names," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(11), pages 1506-1515, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyuree Kim & Dongwoo Ko, 2020. "How to Build a Sustainable MICE Environment Based on Social Identity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Fransen, Marieke L. & Fennis, Bob M. & Pruyn, Ad Th. H. & Das, Enny, 2008. "Rest in peace? Brand-induced mortality salience and consumer behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(10), pages 1053-1061, October.
    3. Selcan Kara & Kunter Gunasti & William T. Ross, 0. "My brand identity lies in the brand name: personified suggestive brand names," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    4. Selcan Kara & Kunter Gunasti & William T. Ross, 2020. "My brand identity lies in the brand name: personified suggestive brand names," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(5), pages 607-621, September.
    5. Kronrod, Ann & Lowrey, Tina M., 2016. "Tastlé-Nestlé, Toogle-Google: The effects of similarity to familiar brand names in brand name innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1182-1189.
    6. Carnevale, Marina & Hadi, Rhonda & Luna, David & Pogacar, Ruth, 2023. "Follow your nose when it sounds right: How brand names influence consumer responses to product scents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Kun Chen & Stephen J. Newell & Gang Kou & Lei Zhang & Chen Hua Li, 2017. "Effective strategies for developing meaningful names and associations for co-branded products in new and emerging markets," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(4), pages 362-374, August.
    8. Baumann, Chris & Hamin, Hamin, 2014. "Premium generic brand (PGB) choice vis-Ã -vis generic and national brands: A scenario comparison for self-use, family consumption and gift giving in a food versus non-food and cross-cultural context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 492-501.
    9. Tina M. Lowrey & Ann Kronrod, 2012. "Phonetic Similarity in Brand Name Innovation," Working Papers 0019, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    10. Andrea Boccardi & Cristiano Ciappei & Lamberto Zollo & Maria Carmen Laudano, 2016. "The Role of Heritage and Authenticity in the Value Creation of Fashion Brand," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(7), pages 135-143, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae11:114361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.