IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcp10/125247.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Food from the Water: How the Fish Production Revolution Affects Aquatic Biodiversity and Food Security

Author

Listed:
  • Williams, Meryl J.

Abstract

The production of food from marine and freshwaters is undergoing a profound revolution—from hunting to farming or from fishing to aquaculture. Fishing and aquaculture exploit and alter the biodiversity on which they are based, each in different but convergent ways. Fishing harvests a much larger range of biodiversity at ecosystem, species and genetic levels than aquaculture. Nearly 400 aquatic species are cultured and more than 5000 species captured in fisheries. Aquaculture and fishing tend to reduce genetic, species and ecosystem diversity, but along different pathways. Fishing reduces genetic and species diversity through selectively removing target individuals with desired characteristics, such as large size, and alters ecosystems. Aquaculture is currently developing across a broad front, using many different species but in inefficient ways. A deliberate program of careful species selection using a broad range of criteria for farming and markets, including food security, should be encouraged, along with research to close the lifecycles of the selected species, improved farm breeds and conservation of germplasm. Aquatic biodiversity for food production receives little policy and management attention but international research provides major support to its sustainable use and conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Williams, Meryl J., 2010. "Food from the Water: How the Fish Production Revolution Affects Aquatic Biodiversity and Food Security," 2010: Biodiversity and World Food Security: Nourishing the Planet and Its People, 30 August-1 September 2010 125247, Crawford Fund.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp10:125247
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.125247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/125247/files/Williams2010.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.125247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindner, Robert K., 2005. "Impacts of Mud Crab Hatchery Technology in Vietnam," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113214, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    2. Silvestre, G. & Garces, L.R. & Stobutzki, I. & Ahmed, M. & Valmonte-Santos, R.A. & Luna, C.Z. & Zhou, W., 2003. "South and south-east Asian coastal fisheries: their status and directions for improved management: conference synopsis and recommendations," Monographs, The WorldFish Center, number 36430, April.
    3. Christian N. K. Anderson & Chih-hao Hsieh & Stuart A. Sandin & Roger Hewitt & Anne Hollowed & John Beddington & Robert M. May & George Sugihara, 2008. "Why fishing magnifies fluctuations in fish abundance," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7189), pages 835-839, April.
    4. Williams, Meryl., 1996. "The transition in the contribution of living aquatic resources to food security.:," 2020 vision discussion papers 13, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Daniel E. Schindler & Ray Hilborn & Brandon Chasco & Christopher P. Boatright & Thomas P. Quinn & Lauren A. Rogers & Michael S. Webster, 2010. "Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species," Nature, Nature, vol. 465(7298), pages 609-612, June.
    6. Megan Williams, 2001. "Science in culture," Nature, Nature, vol. 412(6843), pages 122-122, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thanassekos, Stéphane & Scheld, Andrew M., 2020. "Simulating the effects of environmental and market variability on fishing industry structure," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Holland, Daniel S. & Herrera, Guillermo E., 2012. "The impact of age structure, uncertainty, and asymmetric spatial dynamics on regulatory performance in a fishery metapopulation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 207-218.
    3. Delgado, Christopher L. & Rosegrant, Mark W. & Steinfeld, Henning & Ehui, Simeon K. & Courbois, Claude, 1999. "Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution," 2020 vision briefs 61, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Isomaa, Marleena & Kaitala, Veijo & Laakso, Jouni, 2013. "Baltic cod (Gadus morhua callarias) recovery potential under different environment and fishery scenarios," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 118-125.
    5. Vélez-Espino, Luis A. & Koops, Marten A., 2012. "Capacity for increase, compensatory reserves, and catastrophes as determinants of minimum viable population in freshwater fishes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 319-326.
    6. Nonaka, Etsuko & Kuparinen, Anna, 2023. "Limited effects of size-selective harvesting and harvesting-induced life-history changes on the temporal variability of biomass dynamics in complex food webs," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    7. Giovanni Polverino & Upama Aich & Jack A Brand & Michael G Bertram & Jake M Martin & Hung Tan & Vrishin R Soman & Rachel T Mason & Bob B M Wong, 2023. "Sex-specific effects of psychoactive pollution on behavioral individuality and plasticity in fish," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(6), pages 969-978.
    8. Maredia, Mywish K. & Raitzer, David A., 2012. "Review and analysis of documented patterns of agricultural research impacts in Southeast Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 46-58.
    9. Nye, Janet A. & Gamble, Robert J. & Link, Jason S., 2013. "The relative impact of warming and removing top predators on the Northeast US large marine biotic community," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 264(C), pages 157-168.
    10. Rau, Anna-Lena & von Wehrden, Henrik & Abson, David J., 2018. "Temporal Dynamics of Ecosystem Services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 122-130.
    11. Dercole, Fabio & Prieu, Charlotte & Rinaldi, Sergio, 2010. "Technological change and fisheries sustainability: The point of view of Adaptive Dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(3), pages 379-387.
    12. Emilie Reuchlin-Hugenholtz & Nancy L Shackell & Jeffrey A Hutchings, 2015. "The Potential for Spatial Distribution Indices to Signal Thresholds in Marine Fish Biomass," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Ron Duncan, 1998. "An Optimistic View of World Food Prospects," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 73-82.
    14. Akpaniteaku, R.C. & Weimin, M. & Xinhua, Y., 2005. "Evaluation of the contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to food security in developing countries," Naga, The WorldFish Center, vol. 28(1/2), pages 28-32.
    15. Mallory, Mindy L. & Ando, Amy W., 2014. "Implementing efficient conservation portfolio design," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-18.
    16. Tahvonen, Olli, 2009. "Economics of harvesting age-structured fish populations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 281-299, November.
    17. Scott Forbes, 2012. "Parental preference for investment risk incites family strife," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 115-128, July.
    18. Vilém Pechanec & Lenka Štěrbová & Jan Purkyt & Marcela Prokopová & Renata Včeláková & Ondřej Cudlín & Pavel Vyvlečka & Emil Cienciala & Pavel Cudlín, 2022. "Selected Aspects of Carbon Stock Assessment in Aboveground Biomass," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Ezard, Thomas H.G. & Coulson, Tim, 2010. "How sensitive are elasticities of long-run stochastic growth to how environmental variability is modelled?," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(2), pages 191-200.
    20. Corbishley, James & Pearce, David, 2006. "Zero Tillage for Weed Control in India: the Contribution to Poverty Alleviation," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 113172, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp10:125247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crawfordfund.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.