IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cars06/36970.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Income Efficiency Of Soil Conservation Techniques In Haiti

Author

Listed:
  • Jolly, Curtis M.
  • Shannon, Dennis A.
  • Bannister, Michael
  • Flauretin, Gardy
  • Dale, John (Zach)
  • Binns, Alvin
  • Lindo, Pauline

Abstract

Soil erosion and environmental degradation are serious problems facing food security in Haiti. In 1999, the annual soil loss due to erosion was estimated at 36 million m3 tons. The government of Haiti has been aware of these deteriorating conditions and has sought international assistance to reduce these problems. In 1993, the United States Agency for International Development implemented a soil conservation project and millions of dollars were spent on the encouragement of adoption of soil conservation measures; yet the problems of soil degradation is still menacing food security in Haiti. Hence the need to evaluate the impact of soil conservation in Haiti is important. A survey of 951 farmers, who adopted soil conservation techniques in Haiti, was conducted. The survey participants were composed of 83.6% males and 16.2% females. About 53.3% were illiterate and 42.9 and 4.0% received up to eight years schooling and primary education, respectively. The age group range included 8.5% who were less than 30, 30.8% who were between 30 and 45 years old and 32.6% who were between 45 and 60, and 28.1% who were above 60 years old. The results showed that the soil conservation techniques most commonly adopted by farmers were crop bands, alley cropping, rock walls, and gully plugs. Most farmers were satisfied with the soil conservation techniques adopted and they were aware of the benefits of these techniques. There was no significant difference in income per ha for the soil conservation techniques: alley cropping, rock walls and gully plugs. The net income per ha for crop bands was superior to that of alley cropping, rock walls and gully plugs. All models had a good fit as shown by a relatively high adjusted R2 and a low mean square error. The model results showed in general the number of plots, the elevation, the number of trees greater than 10 centimeters in circumference, the evaluation of the soil by farmers as fertile and the number of crops unique to the soil conservation technique positively influence the net revenue per ha. The average age of head of household negatively influenced the net income per hectare.

Suggested Citation

  • Jolly, Curtis M. & Shannon, Dennis A. & Bannister, Michael & Flauretin, Gardy & Dale, John (Zach) & Binns, Alvin & Lindo, Pauline, 2007. "Income Efficiency Of Soil Conservation Techniques In Haiti," 26th West Indies Agricultural Economics Conference, July 2006, San Juan, Puerto Rico 36970, Caribbean Agro-Economic Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cars06:36970
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.36970
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/36970/files/Proceeding%20of%20the%2026th%20West%20Indies-Jolly%20et%20al-pgs-156-163.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.36970?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bayard, Budry & Jolly, Curtis M. & Shannon, Dennis A., 2006. "The Adoption and Management of Soil Conservation Practices in Haiti: The Case of Rock Walls," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 7(2), pages 1-12, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Ghali & Maha Ben Jaballah & Nejla Ben Arfa & Annie Sigwalt, 2022. "Analysis of factors that influence adoption of agroecological practices in viticulture," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 103(3), pages 179-209, September.
    2. Ojo, Temitope O. & Baiyegunhi, Lloyd J.S & Adetoro, Adetoso A. & Ogundeji, Abiodun A., 2021. "Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Technology and Its Impact on the Productivity of Smallholder Rice Farmers in Southwest, Nigeria," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314981, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Douglas W. Allen & Allison Borchers, 2016. "Conservation Practices and the Growth of US Cash Rent Leases," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 491-509, June.
    4. KOKOYE, Senakpon & JOLLY, Curtis.M. & MOLNAR, Joseph & SHANNON, Dennis & BAYARD, Budry, 2016. "Adoption And Impact Of Soil Conservation Practices On Farm Income: Evidence From Northern Haiti," 2016 Annual Meeting, February 6-9, 2016, San Antonio, Texas 230145, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. repec:ags:ijamad:151877 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Olarinde, Luke O. & Binam, Joachim & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Maman, Nouri & Adekunle, Adewale A., 2010. "Adoption of and farmers’ exposure to soil and Water Management (SWMGT) Practices in the Sahel Savanna of West Africa: Average Treatment Effect (ATE) Estimations," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 95983, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    7. Rasouliazar, Soleiman & Fealy, Saeid, 2013. "Affective Factors in the Wheat Farmers’ Adoption of Farming Methods of Soil Management in West Azerbaijan Province, Iran," International Journal of Agricultural Management and Development (IJAMAD), Iranian Association of Agricultural Economics, vol. 3(2), pages 1-10, June.
    8. repec:ags:ijamad:151874 is not listed on IDEAS

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cars06:36970. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caestea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.