IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare95/171158.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ontario Beef Producers' Attitudes about Artificial Insemination

Author

Listed:
  • Howard, Wayne H.
  • Cranfield, John

Abstract

Characteristics and attitudes of Ontario beef producers who us artificial insemination (AI) and those who use natural breeding wer compare?. Natural breeders are characterized as larger and more commercia and profit oriented. Time, convenience, and problems with heat detectio are the main problems natural breeders associate with AI.

Suggested Citation

  • Howard, Wayne H. & Cranfield, John, 1995. "Ontario Beef Producers' Attitudes about Artificial Insemination," 1995 Conference (39th), February 14-16, 1995, Perth, Australia 171158, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare95:171158
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.171158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/171158/files/1995-11-17-18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.171158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kerr, William A., 1984. "Selective Breeding, Heritable Characteristics And Genetic-Based Technological Change In The Canadian Beef Cattle Industry," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tambi, N. E. & Mukhebi, W. A. & Maina, W. O. & Solomon, H. -M., 1999. "Probit analysis of livestock producers' demand for private veterinary services in the high potential agricultural areas of Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 163-176, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnson, Nancy L., 1995. "The Diffusion Of Livestock Breeding Technology In The U.S.: Observations On The Relationship Between Technical Change And Industry Structure," Staff Papers 13706, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    2. Richards, Timothy J. & Jeffrey, Scott R., 1995. "Hedonic Pricing of Dairy Bulls - An Alternative Index of Genetic Merit," Project Report Series 24035, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    3. Christine E Whitt & Loren W Tauer & Heather Huson, 2019. "Bull efficiency using dairy genetic traits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Schroeder, Ted C. & Mintert, James R. & Brazle, Frank & Grunewald, Orlen C., 1988. "Factors Affecting Feeder Cattle Price Differentials," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, July.
    5. Dhuyvetter, Kevin C. & Schroeder, Ted C. & Simms, Danny D. & Bolze, Ronald P., Jr. & Geske, Jeremy, 1996. "Determinants Of Purebred Beef Bull Price Differentials," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Gray, Emily M. & Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z. & Isberg, Sally R., 2007. "Simulating economic values of a genetic improvement program for Australian farmed saltwater crocodiles," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(1), pages 1-16.
    7. Daniel Muluwork Atsbeha & Dadi Kristofersson & Kyrre Rickertsen, 2012. "Animal Breeding and Productivity Growth of Dairy Farms," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(4), pages 996-1012.
    8. Amaro, Ignacio Benito, 2021. "Valuation Method of Livestock Loss: Farm Level," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314995, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Considine, Jennifer I. & Kerr, William A. & Smith, Gregory R. & Ulmer, S. Monica, 1986. "The Impact Of A New Grading System On The Beef Cattle Industry: The Case Of Canada," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare95:171158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.